Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: TAKA ELEVATOR COMPANY, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TAKA ELEVATOR COMPANY, LLC in 7500 SW ARCHER DR MAYFAIR APARTMENTS, GAINESVILLE, FL 32608 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342972486.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Taka Elevator Company, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Taka Elevator Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7500 SW ARCHER DR MAYFAIR APARTMENTS
City
GAINESVILLE
State
FL
ZIP
32608
Mailing
PO BOX 940161, MAITLAND, FL 32794
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
14
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.405 A02 II E

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(E): Lamps used in temporary wiring for general illumination were not protected from accidental contact or breakage:  a. On or about February 15, 2018 employees working in the elevator shaft had installed temporary lighting from the first floor to the third floor, that was not protected from accidental contact or breakage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2328
  • · Z (S) $3880

1926.405 A02 II F

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(F): Temporary lights were suspended by their electric cords when such lights and cords were not designed for suspension:  a. On or about February 15, 2018 Employees working inside the elevator shaft had suspended a home made temporary lighting system from a sheet rock screw affixed to the side wall of the shaft on the third floor and draped the wires down the shaft to the first floor. At each light socket spliced to the wire a sheetrock screw affixed the wires to the wall.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.405 A02 II J

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Flexible cords used with temporary and portable lights were not designed for hard or extra-hard usage:  a. On or about February 15, 2018 Employees had utilized a home made temporary lighting system constructed with 16 gauge, 2 conductor non grounded SPT2 lamp wire, with medium base 2 wire temporary light sockets. The electric lamp wire was not deigned for hard or extra hard usage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.502 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high.  a. On or about February 15, 2018 Employees working outside the elevator shaft on the 3rd and 2nd floors, were not protected by a guardrail system complete with midrails, exposing them to falls in excess of 30 feet to the pit floor below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3880.2
  • · Z (S) $6467

1926.502 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(3): Guardrail systems were not capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds (890 N) applied within 2 inches (5.1 cm) of the top edge, in any outward or downward direction, at any point along the top edge:  a. On or about February 15, 2018 employees working outside the elevator shaft were not protected from falling more than 30 feet to the elevator pit because the guardrail system positioned at the shaft openings were not affixed to the walls or to the shaft opening and could not withstand 200 pounds applied laterally to the guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342972486.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.