Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IGNACIO RESENDIZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of IGNACIO RESENDIZ in 3473 MARKET RUN, RICHARDSON, TX 75082 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342981693.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ignacio Resendiz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ignacio Resendiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
IGNACIO RESENDIZ
Site address
3473 MARKET RUN
City
RICHARDSON
State
TX
ZIP
75082
Mailing
603 MOCKINGBIRD DR., MURPHY, TX 75094
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by 29 CFR 1910.178(l):     (a) Residential construction site, employees operated a JLG 6042 forklift truck without having first completed training consisting of formal instruction, practical training, and an evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. Employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushed by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.     (a) Residential construction site, where employees were using a Husqvarna K3000, were not protected from the hazard of being struck by flying particle(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.    (a) Residential construction site, employees were performing masonry work from the northside tubular welded scaffold that was not restrained from displacement. Employees were exposed to scaffold collapse hazards.    (b) Residential construction site, employees were performing masonry work from the westside tubular westside tubular welded scaffold that was not restrained from displacement. Employees were exposed to scaffold collapse hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:     (a) Residential construction site, on the northside tubular welded scaffold system third tier, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 19-feet to the ground below.     (b) Residential construction site, at the intersection of the northside and westside tubular welded scaffold system on the third tier, employees were exposed to the hazard of falling 19-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)      a) Residential home (Northside Tubular Welded Scaffold), during masonry operations, employees working from the scaffold platforms on the third and fourth tier of the tubular welded scaffold were not fully planked. Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling 26-feet to the ground below.     (b) Residential home (Westside Tubular Welded Scaffold), during masonry operations, employees working from the scaffold platforms on the fourth tier of the tubular welded scaffold were not fully planked. Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling 26-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2018
Abate by
Apr 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2): Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section:     (a) Residential construction site, northside tubular welded scaffold system , employees working below the scaffolds were not protected from the hazard falling or flying tools and materials.    (b) Residential construction site, westside tubular welded scaffold system, employees working below the scaffolds were not protected from the hazard of falling or flying tools and materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2217

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342981693.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.