OXFORD, GA —
OSHA Inspection: TRUE TRUSS - ATLANTA, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TRUE TRUSS - ATLANTA, INC. in 326 GEORGIA HIGHWAY 81, OXFORD, GA 30054 (NAICS 321214). OSHA activity number 342995479.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRUE TRUSS - ATLANTA, INC.
- Site address
- 326 GEORGIA HIGHWAY 81
- City
- OXFORD
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30054
- Mailing
- 326 GEORGIA HIGHWAY 81, OXFORD, GA 30054
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321214
- Employees
- 65
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $5,432 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, and rotating parts: a) Plant - On or about 03/06/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the ALS 4.0 automatic linear saw and the pin for the interlock (controlling the door and the brake) was not attached to the door, sending a false signal that the door was closed. The interlock was bypassed and the saw continued in operation when the door was opened. Or in the Alternative: 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) Plant - On or about 03/06/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the ALS 4.0 automatic linear saw and the pin for the interlock (controlling the door and the brake) was not attached to the door, sending a false signal that the door was closed. The interlock was bypassed and the saw continued in operation when the door was opened. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5432.4
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) Plant - On or 05/25/17 and at times prior thereto the employer did not assess the level of noise in the different areas of the plant to determine if a Hearing Conservation Program was required. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: On or about 03/06/18 and at time prior thereto employees operated automatic saws, truss presses, performed cleaning, maintenance and repairs of machinery, transported wood, and operated forklifts. The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.147 C06 II
- Issued
- Jun 5, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed: On or about 03/06/18 and at times prior thereto employees performed maintenance/repairs and applied lockout/tagout on equipment including (but not limited to) the Alpine ALS 4.0 automatic linear saw., the Alpine ALS 276 automatic saw, the Automill, and the Alpine truss presses. The employer did not certify that periodic, and at least yearly inspections/audits of the specific written lockout/tagout procedures hd been performed. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321214)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342995479.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.