DELAFIELD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: HELLENBRAND GLASS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HELLENBRAND GLASS, LLC in 220 ENTERPRISE ROAD, DELAFIELD, WI 53018 (NAICS 238150). OSHA activity number 342995602.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HELLENBRAND GLASS, LLC
- Site address
- 220 ENTERPRISE ROAD
- City
- DELAFIELD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53018
- Mailing
- 211 MORAVIAN VALLEY ROAD, WAUNAKEE, WI 53597
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238150
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,173 · Current $2,586 Reduced
15919020BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces were kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition. (a) The lunch/break table in the shop was not kept in a clean and sanitary condition. On or about March 6, 2018, sampling of the surface dust on the lunch/break table revealed potential cadmium and lead dust contamination from adjacent glass window and painted window frame restoration activities. This exposed employees to cadmium and lead dust hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2586
- — Z (S) $5173
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,173 · Current $2,586 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) The employer did not assess the workplace to determine the hazards associated with the restoration of old and historical building windows and frames. This exposed employees to flying debris and dust contaminated with potential lead, cadmium and asbestos, created from removal of old paint, glazing and putty from the windows.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2586
- — Z (S) $5173
1910.1001 D02 I
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(d)(2)(i): The employer did not perform initial monitoring of employees who were, or might reasonably be expected to be exposed to airborne concentrations at or above the 8-hour TWA and/or excursion limits: (a) Employees conduct restoration of old and historical building windows and frames, that requires the removal of old paint, glazing and putty. No air monitoring had been done to determine each worker's full shift and short term exposure to asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1025 D02
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level. (a) Employees conduct restoration of old and historical building windows and frames, that requires the removal of old paint, glazing and putty. No air monitoring had been done to determine each worker's full shift and short term exposure to lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $2,586 Reduced
15919020BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with all of its requirements. Employees were provided and used 3M half face elastomeric respirators with N100 cartridges and disposable (N95) respirators while performing old window restoration work activities that produced dust containing potential lead and cadmium.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2586
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
15919020BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator to perform window restoration work tasks. Employees were provided and used 3M half face elastomeric respirators with N100 cartridges and disposable (N95) respirators while performing restoration work activities that produced dust containing potential lead and cadmium.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
15919020BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) Employees were not given a fit test when provided with 3M half face elastomeric respirators with N100 cartridges and disposable (N95) respirators, while performing restoration work activities that produced dust containing potential lead and cadmium.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
15919020BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: (a) The employer allowed employees with facial hair to wear a respirator while performing window restoration work activities, exposing employees to dust containing potential lead and cadmium.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
15919020BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) A written hazard communication program was not developed and implemented to inform employees of the chemical hazards they are potentially exposed to while performing restoration work on old windows. This exposed employees to possible lead dust and asbestos, and a variety of wood glues, epoxy wood fillers, primers, alcohol, acetone and cleaners/removers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1940
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Apr 27, 2018
- Abate by
- May 16, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
15919020BWPB
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: (a) The employer did not ensure that each container including glass jars of PVA resin glue, plastic squirt bottles, and a spray bottle of water and bleach in the shop area were labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings of the chemicals contained within the container.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238150)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342995602.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.