Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEWIS CONCRETE RESTORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of LEWIS CONCRETE RESTORATION in 15000 EDGEMERE, EL PASO, TX 79938 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 342997186.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lewis Concrete Restoration — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lewis Concrete Restoration is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15000 EDGEMERE
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79938
Mailing
9209 WILLIAMSON, BUDA, TX 78610
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1203 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1203(a): Before it begins work at a worksite, each employer must ensure that a competent person identifies all confined spaces in which one or more of the employees it directs may work, and identifies each space that is a permit space, through consideration and evaluation of the elements of that space, including testing as necessary:    On or about February 21, 2018, the employer did not ensure that confined spaces were identified as a permit required confine space by testing with calibrated equipment for potential atmospheric hazards. Employees were exposed to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9054

1926.1203 E02 V B

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1203(e)(2)(v)(B): The forced air ventilation must be so directed as to ventilate the immediate areas where an employee is or will be present within the space and must continue until all employees have left the space;    On or about February 21, 2018, the employer did not ensure that positive air ventilation was used for entrant(s) working in 22.5 ft. deep manholes. Employees were exposed health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1203 E02 VI

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1203(e)(2)(vi): The employer did not continuously monitor the atmosphere of the Permit-Required Confined Space and did not demonstrate that equipment for continuous monitoring was not commercially available or periodic monitoring was sufficient:    On or about February 21, 2018, the employer did not continuously monitor the atmosphere and did not demonstrate that periodic monitoring was sufficient for entrant(s) working in 22.5 ft. deep manholes. Employees were exposed to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1203 E02 IX

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1203(e)(2)(ix): The employer did not verify that the space was safe for entry and that the pre-entry measures required by paragraph 1926.1203(e)(2) were taken, through a written certification that contained the date, the location of the space, and the signature of the person providing the certification:    On or about February 21, 2018, the employer did not ensure that confined space entry was deemed safe for entry and that required measures were illustrated through a written certification. Employees were exposed to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1207 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1207(a): The employer did not provide training to each employee whose work is regulated by this standard, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that the employee possesses the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under this standard.     On or about February 21, 2018, the employer did not ensure that training was provided to employee entering a confine space. This condition exposed employee to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9054

1926.1211 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1211(a)(1): A prospective rescuer's ability to respond to a rescue summons in a timely manner, considering the hazard(s) identified was not evaluated:    On or about February 21, 2018 in the event of an emergency, the employer did not ensure that confined space rescue of entrant(s) was evaluated and implemented. Employees were exposed to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $6467

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342997186.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.