Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FLUMENCIO VARGAS

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of FLUMENCIO VARGAS in 5355 S MCCURRY WAY, MERIDIAN, ID 83642 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343004461.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flumencio Vargas — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flumencio Vargas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FLUMENCIO VARGAS
Site address
5355 S MCCURRY WAY
City
MERIDIAN
State
ID
ZIP
83642
Mailing
11365 W ZACHERY AVE, NAMPA, ID 83651
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2018
Abate by
May 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,386 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section.  (a)  On or about March 5, 2018 and at times prior thereto, the employer utilized a Rigid masonry saw to cut brick without taking any steps to protect employees from inhaling silica dust and/or independently make the decision of which dust controls work best to limit exposure.  Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1386
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2018
Abate by
May 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  (a)  On or about March 5, 2018, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not properly implement control measures to determine the amount of silica employees were exposed to.  Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,386 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(2): Where respirator use is required by this section, the employer did not institute a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134:  (a)  On or about March 5, 2018, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a respiratory protection program and provided NIOSH 3M respirators for employees.  Note:  Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1386
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,386 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan tailored to the company does, complying with the requirements of 1926.1153(g)(1)(I) through (iv):  (a)  On or about March 5, 2018, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not have a written exposure control plan.  Note:  Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1386
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1153 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of  the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica; specific tasks in the workplace that could result in exposure to respirable crystalline silica; specific measures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to respirable crystalline silica, including engineering controls, work practices, and respirators to be used; the contents of this section: the identity of the competent person designated by the employer in accordance with paragraph (g)(4) of this section; and the purpose and a description of the medical surveillance program required by paragraph (h) of this section:  (a)  On or about March 5, 2018, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide training to employees on the health effects of silica exposure and workplace tasks that can expose them to silica, and ways to limit exposure.  Note:  Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343004461.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.