ALEXANDER, AR —
OSHA Inspection: RICARDO MORALEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICARDO MORALEZ in 7898 S SHORELINE BLVD, ALEXANDER, AR 72002 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343007316.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICARDO MORALEZ
- Site address
- 7898 S SHORELINE BLVD
- City
- ALEXANDER
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72002
- Mailing
- 4555 OWENSVILLE CUTOFF, LONSDALE, AR 72087
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On March 6, 2018 employees who were working underneath employees who were performing framing construction above were not wearing hard hats at the jobsite. This hazard exposed employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1663.2
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: On March 6, 2018, employees used pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing framing construction on the top plate. This condition exposed employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.405 A02 II I
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables used for temporary wiring were not protected from damage: On March 6, 2018, the electrical extension cords used to power the circular saw were damaged in several places, exposing the internal insulated wires. This condition exposed employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1663.2
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.405 A02 II J
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances were not designed for hard or extra-hard usage: On March 6, 2018, the electrical extension cords used to power the circular saw were not rated for hard or extra-hard usage. This condition exposed employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1663.2
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about March 6, 2018, an employee without fall protection was engaged in residential framing while working on the top plate of the framing. This condition exposed the employee to the hazard of falling to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2018
- Abate by
- May 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about March 6, 2018, employees accessed the top plate of the residential framing via an eight foot stepladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface. This condition exposed employees to the hazard of falling to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2328
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343007316.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.