Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CLASSIC REMODELING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CLASSIC REMODELING in 2 ECKER RD, LITTLE FERRY, NJ 07643 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343009999.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Classic Remodeling — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Classic Remodeling is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CLASSIC REMODELING
Site address
2 ECKER RD
City
LITTLE FERRY
State
NJ
ZIP
07643
Mailing
1 UNIVERSITY PLAZA DRIVE, HACKENSACK, NJ 07601
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes and face was not provided when operations present potential eye or face injury from physical hazards.    a) Building Exterior - South Side: An employee was not wearing eye and face protection while using a pneumatic nail gun to install shingles, on or about 3/9/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:      a) Building Exterior - Roof: An employee was exposed to a 25' fall hazard while working on a  8/12 pitched  roof of a residential home. The employee was wearing a harness but he was not tied off, on or about 3/9/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee      a) Building Exterior - Roof: Employees were exposed to fall hazard while working on a roof. Three employees were tied off to the same anchorage point being used as part of the personal fall arrest system, on or about 3/9/2018
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:      a) Building Exterior - West Side: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while transitioning from an extension ladder to the roof of a residential home. The ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, on or about 3/9/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were not used on stable and level surface nor were they secure to prevent accidental displacement.       a) Building Exterior - West Side: CSHOs observed employees working, accessing and descending the roof from a 25 foot Aluminum extension ladder that was not secure to prevent accidental displacement, on or about 3/9/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause them to lose balance and fall:    Building Exterior - West side: An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 19' while climbing an extension ladder carrying a Pneumatic Nail Gun. Employee fail to maintain a three point contact while climbing an extension ladder, on or about 3/9/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1250
  • — Z (S) $3880

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343009999.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.