OSHA Inspection: BART BYRCYN CONSTRUCTION CO.

Issued

May 10, 2018

Abate by

Jun 6, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $1,845 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the tasks in Table 1,  unless the employer assessed and limited the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.    a) On or about February 27, 2018, Bart Byrcyn Construction Co. did not implement any engineering controls, work practices, or respiratory protection as specified in Table 1 of 1926.1153 when employees were cutting cinder blocks containing silica with a handheld, power saw.

Issued

May 10, 2018

Abate by

Jun 6, 2018

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) On or about February 27, 2018, Bart Byrcyn Construction Co. did not assess the exposure of employee(s) cutting cinder block containing crystalline silica using a hand held masonry saw.

Issued

May 10, 2018

Abate by

Jun 6, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $1,845 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:    a) On or about February 27, 2018, Bart Byrcyn Construction Co. did not establish and implement a written silica exposure control plan that complied with the requirements of 1926.1153(g)(1)(I) through (iv) when employees were cutting cinder block containing crystalline silica with a hand held power saw.

Issued

May 10, 2018

Abate by

Jun 6, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained in accordance with the provisions of hazard communication standard and paragraph (i)(2) of this section:    a) On or about February 27, 2018, Bart Byrcyn Construction Co. did not ensure that all employees exposed to crystalline silica received training required by the hazard communication standard and 29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2).

Issued

May 10, 2018

Abate by

Jun 6, 2018

Penalty

Initial $311 · Current $310 Reduced

Hazardous substances P104

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.59: The requirements applicable to construction work under this section are identical to those set forth at 29 CFR 1910.1200 of this chapter.    29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met:    a) On December 19, 2017, Carollo Masonry, Inc. did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) that would describe or include at least the following:  1) Requirement for labeling and other forms of warning;  2) Safety data sheet availability;  3) Employee information and training;  4) A list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the workplace;   5) Methods to inform employees of the hazards on non-routine tasks; and   6) Methods to provide other employer(s) access to safety data sheet; information on any precautionary measures and the labeling system used in the workplace.    Employee(s) were exposed to hazardous chemicals including but not limited to crystalline silica and portland cement.