Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SDI STORES LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SDI STORES LLC in 160 CORPORATE COURT, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 424330). OSHA activity number 343012746.

Watch SDI Stores LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SDI Stores LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SDI STORES LLC
Site address
160 CORPORATE COURT
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06450
Mailing
160 CORPORATE COURT, MERIDEN, CT 06450
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424330
Employees
407
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5543.00 · Current $5543.00
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces were not kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition:  ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not ensure that dust accumulated throughout the warehouse was cleaned as needed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5543
  • — Z (S) $5543

1910.30 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $11086.00 · Current $11086.00
29 CFR 1910.30(b)(1): The employer did not train each employee on or before May 17, 2017 in the proper care, inspection, storage, and use of equipment covered by this subpart before an employee uses the equipment.  ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not ensure that employees using step stools and/or stair ladders were provided with training in the proper care, inspection, storage and use of the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $11086
  • — Z (S) $11086

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5543.00 · Current $5543.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):  The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).  ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not perform a Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5543
  • — Z (S) $5543

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment(PPE):  ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not ensure that each employee was provided with training for proper type, use, and maintenance of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5543.00 · Current $5543.00
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.  ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not ensure that employees performing tasks, such as (but not limited to) charging forklift batteries and/or order picking of boxed material were provided with appropriate protective gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5543
  • — Z (S) $5543

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $9239.00 · Current $9239.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:  ESTABLISHMENT:  The Hyster L10 forklift truck, having a few unsafe conditions, such as (but not limited to) a tire was severely cracked, the cover for the horn broken off, the handle for the lever broken, and the seat was severely deteriorated was not removed from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9239
  • — Z (S) $9239

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 200 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1848.00 · Current $1848.00
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): The OSHA 300 log of work-related injuries and illnesses were not completed in detail.  ESTABLISHMENT:  The OSHA 300 log of Work-related Injuries and Illnesses for year of 2018 was not completed in detail as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1848
  • — Z (O) $1848

1910.38 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(1): The employer did not review the emergency action plan with each employee covered under the plan when the plan was developed or when employees initially were assigned to a job.  ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not ensure that employees received emergency evacuation training upon their initial assignment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not develop and implement a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) battery acid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

MACY'S

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343012746.