SAN ANTONIO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: F2 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of F2 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC in 135 CEDAR STREET, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78210 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343016507.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- F2 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC
- Site address
- 135 CEDAR STREET
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78210
- Mailing
- 1250 MISTY LANE, SPRING BRANCH, TX 78070
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Parking Lot next to the building under construction: On or about March 7, 2018, an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard while not wearing head protection and standing below employees working from an elevated aerial.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1663
1926.101 A
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.101(a): Ear protective devices were not provided and/or were not used when it was not feasible to reduce noise levels or duration of exposures to those specified in Table D-2, Permissible Noise Exposure, in 29 CFR 1926.52: Parking Lot next to the building under construction: On or about March 7, 2018, an employee was exposed to a noise hazard while using a Pneumatic Coil Siding Nailer, Model DF225C while not wearing ear protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: Parking Lot next to the building under construction: On or about March 7, 2018, an employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard while using a Pneumatic Coil Siding Nailer, Model DF225C while not wearing appropriate eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: Parking Lot next to the building under construction: On or about March 7, 2018, an employee was exposed to an electrical hazard while using an extension cord to power a circular saw while the outer jacket of the extension cord was pulled away from the plug exposing its internal wiring.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1663
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under1626.502(e). Parking Lot next to the building under construction: On or about March 7, 2018, two employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while installing soffit to the exterior of the building from a JLG 460SL aerial lift without wearing a Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343016507.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.