Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ASCO CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ASCO CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 3601 S BRYANT STREET, SHERIDAN, CO 80110 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343024360.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Asco Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Asco Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3601 S BRYANT STREET
City
SHERIDAN
State
CO
ZIP
80110
Mailing
2582 COMMERCE BLVD, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G04 I

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $6,467
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i):  Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms:      1) On March 19, 2018, employees were exposed to falls in excess of 25 feet where midrails, or equivalent structural members, were not installed on the guardrail systems on a supported scaffold used by employees to conduct masonry work.      2) On March 19, 2018, employees were exposed to falls in excess of 25 feet where a section of guardrail, or equivalent structural members, was missing on a supported scaffold used by employees to conduct masonry work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.451 H02 II

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:      1) On March 19, 2018, employees working on the ground below a scaffold were exposed to falling object hazards where a toeboard was not erected at the level where employees were doing masonry work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $6,467
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:    1) On or about March 16, 2018, and at prior times, employees used handheld power saws to cut concrete masonry blocks.  The employer did not ensure employees used saws equipped with integrated water delivery systems, per the engineering and work practice controls listed in table 1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1153 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who is or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:      1) On or about March 16, 2018, and at prior times, employees used handheld power saws to cut concrete masonry blocks.  The employer did not assess the respirable crystalline silica exposure of the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:    1) On or about March 16, 2018, and at prior times, employees used handheld power saws to cut concrete masonry blocks.  The employer had not implemented an exposure control plan, including the elements required by paragraph (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(iv) of this section.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(4): The employer did not designate a competent person to make frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and equipment to implement the written exposure control plan:    1) On or about March 16, 2018, and at prior times, employees used handheld power saws to cut concrete masonry blocks.  The employer had not designated a competent person who had the knowledge and authorization to take prompt corrective measures and to implement required engineering controls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   1) On or about March 16, 2018, and at prior times, the employer required employees who cut masonry blocks to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators.  The employer did not provide medical evaluations to determine the employees physical ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  1) On or about March 16, 2018, and at prior times, the employer required employees who cut masonry blocks to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators.  The employer did not ensure that employees passed a qualitative or quantitative fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Asco Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343024360.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.