Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DUNLAP'S CUSTOM CABINETS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DUNLAP'S CUSTOM CABINETS, INC. in 6448 OLD DALLAS ROAD, ELM MOTT, TX 76640 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 343024600.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dunlap'S Custom Cabinets, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dunlap'S Custom Cabinets, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6448 OLD DALLAS ROAD
City
ELM MOTT
State
TX
ZIP
76640
Mailing
6448 OLD DALLAS ROAD, ELM MOTT, TX 76640
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

15 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment.        The employer did not ensure employees wore safety glasses when operating equipment such as saws and sanders, exposing them to eye injuries from flying debris and dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.141 A03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): Places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed:      The employer failed to maintain the workplace in a clean and sanitary condition throughout the whole shop, exposing employees to safety and health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:      The employer failed to ensure all fire extinguishers were readily accessible exposing employees to entrapment and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:        The employer failed to ensure that all table saws were properly guarded with an adjusting hood, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.213 H01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(1): Radial saw(s) did not have an upper hood that completely enclosed the upper portion of the blade down to a point including the end of the saw arbor.      The employer failed to ensure that Radial Arm saws were properly guarded with an adjusting hood covering the blade down to the point including the end of the saw arbor, exposing employees to amputation hazards.      a)  Delta located at the back-south wall.    b) Craftsman located at the center aisle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.213 H02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(2): Radial saw(s) used for ripping were not provided with nonkickback fingers or dogs located on both sides of the saw so as to oppose the trust or tendency of the saw to pick up material or throw it back toward the operator.   The employer failed to ensure that the Delta Radial Arm saw located at the back wall was properly equipped with kickbacks on both sides of the saw blade, exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 H04

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(h)(4): Radial saw(s) were not installed in a manner so as to cause the cutting head to return gently to the starting position when released by the operator.   The employer failed to ensure that all Radial arm saws were properly installed so that the cutting arm retracts back to the starting position, exposing employees to amputation hazards.    1.  2- Delta Radial arm Saws:  one located on the south wall; 2nd one located on the north wall. 2.  2-Craftsman 10" Radial arm saws:  one located at center aisle of the plant; 2nd one back up against the wall
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,434 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i      The employer failed to ensure that company's compressed air was reduced to 30 psi for cleaning and blowing off individuals, exposing employees to impalement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4434

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:      The employer did not ensure electrical cord that energizes the Delta band saw was inspected for damage prior to use, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws.   The employer failed to ensure the flexible cords from the flexible conduit hanging from ceiling was protected by means of a strain relief, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):   The employer failed to ensure that flexible cords were free from any external defects, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.    1.  Orange extension cord on the west wall, used to energize tools. 2.  Orange extension cord on the floor between the table saw and the west wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    The employer did not ensure junction/gangway boxes were permanently installed throughout the shop, in accordance with NFPA 70 and the manufacturer requirements of listing and labeling instructions exposing employees to the hazards of electrocution, electrical shock and fire.     1.  A metal receptacle gang box handing from the ceiling near table saws.  2.  A metal receptacle gang box on the floor energizing a table saw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.305 B01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Openings through which conductors enter boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    The employer failed to ensure that electrical receptacle gang boxes were effectively closed, exposing employees to fire and electrical shock hazards.  1.  A receptacle gang box hanging from ceiling, had opening at the top. 2.  A metal receptacle gang box hanging from ceiling was damaged and casing was open on the side. 3.  A metal receptacle gang box on the floor was open.  The two sections don't match.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:    The employer failed to ensure that electrical receptacle gang boxes were effectively closed with their appropriate covers, exposing employees to fire and electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 11, 2018
Abate by
Jun 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer failed to report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, within (24) twenty-four hours.      The employer failed to report to OSHA a work-related in-patient hospitalization as a result from an amputation within 24 hours.  The in-patient hospitalization occurred on or about January 16, 2018 and was later reported to OSHA on or about March 6, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (O) $3696

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343024600.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.