Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUD MANUFACTURING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BUD MANUFACTURING, INC. in 4605 355TH STREET, WILLOUGHBY, OH 44094 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 343032561.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BUD Manufacturing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BUD Manufacturing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4605 355TH STREET
City
WILLOUGHBY
State
OH
ZIP
44094
Mailing
4605 355TH STREET, WILLOUGHBY, OH 44094
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332116
Employees
44
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $5,432 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following:  Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a. On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees working from a stair well landing performing powder coating were protected from a fall of approximately 7 feet.     b. On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees performing powder coating were protected from a fall of approximately 4 feet into the powder coating machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5432.4
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.30 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Nov 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who uses personal fall protection systems prior to being exposed to a fall hazard:    On or about April 5, 2018, the employer did not provide fall protection training to employees required to wear a personal fall arrest system to perform powder coating.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Nov 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $5,432 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a. On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees working on the plasma cutter were protected from crushing injuries by ensuring lockout tagout procedures were developed.     b. On or about April 5, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees working on the powder coating wash rack were protected against being struck by water at approximately 2500 psi by ensuring lockout tagout procedures were developed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5432.4
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Nov 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):    a. On or about March 21, 2018, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts and crushing hazards while troubleshooting the fiber optic laser machine located in the production area. The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.     b. On or about April 5, 2018, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with high pressure heated water while cleaning the high pressure wash located in the production area. The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Nov 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure an annual audit was performed of employees performing work on the fiber optic laser machine and high pressure wash. Employees were working inside the machines without controlling hazardous energy through lockout tagout.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Nov 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:    a. On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees performing maintenance on the plasma cutter were trained on lockout tagout. Employees were exposed to crushing hazards.    b. On or about April 5, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees cleaning the powder coat wash rack were trained on lockout tagout. Employees were exposed to an approximate 2500 psi water pressure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Nov 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,328 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    On or about April 5, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees utilizing compressed air at 97 psi to blow remove excess powder coating were protected from flying chips by ensuring the use of an air pressure reducing end.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2328
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $3,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:    On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure angle grinders utilized to grind metal racks in the grinding/welding department had guards in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880.2
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Jun 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure a written certification was performed in the workplace. Employees are required to wear safety glasses, N95 dust masks, nitrile gloves, and welding leathers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Jun 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to perform personal protective equipment training for employees required to wear safety glasses, N95 dust mask, nitrile gloves, and welding leathers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Jul 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iii): Monthly inspections of hooks, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and the serial number, or other identifier, of the hook inspected, were not performed:  On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees operating an American Crane to move steel plates weighing approximately 500 pounds performed monthly hook inspections.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.179 J02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 6, 2018
Abate by
Jul 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2)(iv): Monthly inspections of hoist chains, with a certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier of the chain which was inspected, were not performed:  On or about March 21, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees operating an American Crane to move steel plates weighing approximately 500 pounds performed monthly chain inspections.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View BUD Manufacturing, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343032561.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.