OSHA Inspection: RANBO DURAN

Issued

Apr 3, 2018

Penalty

Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to operate pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing framing activities exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Apr 3, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe:     a)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to use a Makita skill saw which had the guard wedged up exposing the blade and exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.  b)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to use a Makita skill saw which had the guard wedged up exposing the blade and exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Apr 3, 2018

Abate by

Apr 13, 2018

Penalty

Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  a)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to perform framing activities from a job made scaffold with a work platform that measured up to 10 inches wide without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 30 feet to the concrete floor below.

Issued

Apr 3, 2018

Abate by

Apr 13, 2018

Penalty

Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to perform framing activities from a job made scaffold without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of up to 30 feet to the concrete floor below.

Issued

Apr 3, 2018

Penalty

Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to perform roof decking activities without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 10 feet 2 inches to the ground below.  b)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employee to perform framing activities while walking the ceiling trusses without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 19 feet 6 inches to the ground below.

Issued

Apr 3, 2018

Penalty

Initial $3,326 · Current $3,326

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a)  At 2181 Watts Way, Auburn, Alabama:  On or about March 22, 2018 and at times prior; the employer allowed his employees to use an extension ladder to gain access to the second floor of the home and the rails of the ladder did not extend three feet above the landing to provide safe access exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 11 feet 4 inches to the concrete floor below..