Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MALL MOTEL

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MALL MOTEL in 4331 OLD LINCOLN HWY, FEASTERVILLE TREVOSE, PA 19053 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 343041935.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mall Motel — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mall Motel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MALL MOTEL
Site address
4331 OLD LINCOLN HWY
City
FEASTERVILLE TREVOSE
State
PA
ZIP
19053
Mailing
4331 OLD LINCOLN HWY, FEASTERVILLE TREVOSE, PA 19053
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B15

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(15): The employer did not ensure each employee on a walking-working surface 4 feet (1.2m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling to that lower level by an effective means of fall protection:  a)  Worksite - On or about 4/3/18, employees were standing within a dumpster,  approximately five (5) feet above a lower level, without utilizing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jun 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,211 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not perform a written hazard assessment for personal protective equipment to determine the personal protective equipment necessary for employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2211
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jun 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, or when the use of protective footwear will protect the affected employee from an electrical hazard, such as a static-discharge or electric-shock hazard, that remains after the employer takes other necessary protective measures:  a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not require non penetrating protective footwear to employees who are exposed to sharp objects while stomping on garbage in the dumpster.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.28 B13 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jun 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(13)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee was protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, travel restraint system or personal fall arrest system when work was being performed less than 6 feet (1.6m) from the roof's edge.    a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, an employee performed work on a low slope roof, up to 20 feet above grade, to install video cameras and was not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jun 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:  a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, employees performing electrical work were not trained by the employer on the pertinent safety-related work practices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2772
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.333 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jun 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 and did not make it available for inspection by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives:  a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not develop a safety related work practice program for employees who work on electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for the chemicals used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2217
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals.  a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, labels were not placed on of chemical bottles as to the contents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not provide safety data sheets at the worksite for employees to view.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)  Worksite - On or about 3/29/18 employees were not effectively trained about the chemical hazards used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343041935.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.