FEASTERVILLE TREVOSE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: MALL MOTEL
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MALL MOTEL in 4331 OLD LINCOLN HWY, FEASTERVILLE TREVOSE, PA 19053 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 343041935.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MALL MOTEL
- Site address
- 4331 OLD LINCOLN HWY
- City
- FEASTERVILLE TREVOSE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19053
- Mailing
- 4331 OLD LINCOLN HWY, FEASTERVILLE TREVOSE, PA 19053
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.28 B15
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(15): The employer did not ensure each employee on a walking-working surface 4 feet (1.2m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling to that lower level by an effective means of fall protection: a) Worksite - On or about 4/3/18, employees were standing within a dumpster, approximately five (5) feet above a lower level, without utilizing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,211 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not perform a written hazard assessment for personal protective equipment to determine the personal protective equipment necessary for employee use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2211
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, or when the use of protective footwear will protect the affected employee from an electrical hazard, such as a static-discharge or electric-shock hazard, that remains after the employer takes other necessary protective measures: a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not require non penetrating protective footwear to employees who are exposed to sharp objects while stomping on garbage in the dumpster.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.28 B13 I
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(13)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee was protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, travel restraint system or personal fall arrest system when work was being performed less than 6 feet (1.6m) from the roof's edge. a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, an employee performed work on a low slope roof, up to 20 feet above grade, to install video cameras and was not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, employees performing electrical work were not trained by the employer on the pertinent safety-related work practices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.333 B02 I
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 and did not make it available for inspection by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives: a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not develop a safety related work practice program for employees who work on electrical equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for the chemicals used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2217
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals. a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, labels were not placed on of chemical bottles as to the contents.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18, the employer did not provide safety data sheets at the worksite for employees to view.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Worksite - On or about 3/29/18 employees were not effectively trained about the chemical hazards used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343041935.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.