Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GRAND RIVER CONSTRUCTION LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GRAND RIVER CONSTRUCTION LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY in 5650 COTTONTAIL DRIVE, WAUNAKEE, WI 53597 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343045340.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Grand River Construction Limited Liability Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Grand River Construction Limited Liability Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5650 COTTONTAIL DRIVE
City
WAUNAKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53597
Mailing
N8351 DOLGNER ROAD, PARDEEVILLE, WI 53954
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $2,079 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    On or about March 27, 2018, and times prior, the employer did not initiate and maintain safety and health programs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2079
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about March 27, 2018, and times prior, the employer did not instruct each employee on the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about March 27, 2018, employees exposed to fall hazards were not trained on how to recognize and mitigate those fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
Apr 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,247 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    On or about March 27, 2018, employees utilizing pneumatic nail guns were doing so without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1247
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
Apr 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,079 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    On or about March 27, 2018, employees installing roof trusses on a residential home at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2079
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1417 W

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
Apr 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $2,079 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1417(w): 29 CFR 1926.1417(w): The employer did not use a tag or restraint line when necessary to prevent rotation of the load that would be hazardous.    On or about March 27, 2018, a tag / restraint line was not utilized to prevent hazardous rotation when installing roof trusses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2079
  • — Z (S) $2772

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343045340.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.