Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DANIEL RUIZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DANIEL RUIZ in 3513 CROSS HILL DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53718 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343058863.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daniel Ruiz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daniel Ruiz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DANIEL RUIZ
Site address
3513 CROSS HILL DRIVE
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53718
Mailing
316 N. MAIN STREET, BELVIDERE, IL 61008
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2018
Abate by
May 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,881 · Current $2,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(ii): Each employee on a walking/working surface 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level where leading edges are under construction, but who was not engaged in the leading edge work, was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.Note:  If a guardrail system was chosen to provide the fall protection, and a controlled access zone had already been established for leading edge work, the control line may be used in lieu of a guardrail along the edge that parallels the leading edge:    On or about April 2, 2018 individuals working from the second story of an apartment building installing floor joist blocking at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2330
  • — Z (S) $3881

1926.501 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2018
Abate by
May 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who is constructing a leading edge 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  On or about April 2, 2018 individuals working from the second story of an apartment building installing floor sheathing at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2018
Abate by
May 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,654 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    On or about April 2, 2018 individuals exposed to fall hazards were not trained on how to recognize and mitigate those fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1654
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2018
Abate by
May 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section (fall protection training) by preparing a written certification record which contained the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:    On or about April 2, 2018 the employer did not prepare / maintain a certification record pertaining to Fall Protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Daniel Ruiz's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343058863.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.