ARLINGTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ARTURO ROCHA
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ARTURO ROCHA in 4758 LITTLE ELM, ARLINGTON, TX 76006 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 343058996.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARTURO ROCHA
- Site address
- 4758 LITTLE ELM
- City
- ARLINGTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76006
- Mailing
- 3529 AVE M 3529 AVE M, FORT WORTH, TX 76105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,413 · Current $1,413
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On the south side of the commercial building, employees engaged in removing concrete slabs and curbs were not provided with eye and face protection. The employees were exposed to struck-by hazards and eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1413
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,885 · Current $1,885
S900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. On the south side of the commercial building, the employer did not ensure employees using a Bosch jackhammer and a Stihl saw to cut concrete were protected from being exposed to silica with the use of engineering controls, work practices and respiratory protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1885
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
S900
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section. On the south side of the construction site, the employer did not follow table 1 or assess potential exposure for the employees exposed to silica while operating: a) A Bosch jackhammer to remove concrete slabs and curb. b) A STHIL concrete cutter to cut slabs in the parking lot area.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343058996.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.