JACKSONVILLE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: RANDY W. RUDD, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RANDY W. RUDD, INC. in 10415 MONACO DRIVE BUILDINGS E AND H, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32218 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343060307.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RANDY W. RUDD, INC.
- Site address
- 10415 MONACO DRIVE BUILDINGS E AND H
- City
- JACKSONVILLE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32218
- Mailing
- 18950 NE 245TH COURT, SALT SPRINGS, FL 32134
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a. On or about April 3, 2018, employees using nail guns to install roofing shingles were not provided with eye protection, exposing employees to flying debris.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1330.2
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,104 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about April 3, 2018, Building E, three employees installing roofing shingles on a 3:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling 18 feet to the ground by the use of a fall protection system. b. On or about April 3, 2018, Building H, 4 employees installing roofing shingles on a 3:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling 18 feet to the ground by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3104.4
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,104 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about April 3, 2018, Building E, back side of building, the 24-foot extension ladder was not extended 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to an 18 feet fall hazard. b. On or about April 3, 2018, Building H, side of the building, the 24-foot extension ladder was not extended 3 feet above the landing, exposing employees to an 18 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3104.4
- — Z (S) $5174
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343060307.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.