OSHA Inspection: LM CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES, INC

Issued

Apr 10, 2018

Abate by

Apr 16, 2018

Penalty

Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a)  Baltimore Pike & Brooke St, Media, PA - On or about 10/10/17, employees performing roofing work were not provided with adequate fall protection systems, exposing employees to fall hazards.

Issued

Apr 10, 2018

Abate by

Apr 16, 2018

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a)  Baltimore Pike & Brooke St, Media, PA - On or about 10/10/17, the employer did not provide effective training to employees performing roofing work, exposing employees to fall hazards.

Issued

Apr 10, 2018

Abate by

Apr 16, 2018

Penalty

Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged or supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was not less than 34 inches (0.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface.  (a)  Baltimore Pike & Brooke Street, Media, PA - On or about 10/10/17, the warning line system in use had flagged rope which was less than 34 inches from the walking working surface, exposing employees to fall hazards.

Issued

Apr 10, 2018

Abate by

Apr 16, 2018

Penalty

Initial $415 · Current $415

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  (a)  Baltimore Pike & Brooke St, Media, PA - On or about 10/10/17, the employer did not provide training to employees using hazardous chemicals including but not limited to glues and adhesives, liquefied petroleum gas, and gasoline, exposing employees to chemical hazards.