Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GIL'S PAINTING, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GIL'S PAINTING, LLC in 39 SOMERVILLE, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 343067286.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gil'S Painting, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gil'S Painting, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GIL'S PAINTING, LLC
Site address
39 SOMERVILLE
City
FAIRFIELD
State
CT
ZIP
06824
Mailing
187 FAIRCHILD AVENUE, FAIRFIELD, CT 06825
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)  Establishment: The employer did not establish and implement a worksite specific written respiratory program where employees were required to wear full facepiece dual cartridge respirators while performing sanding tasks with a hand-held portable sander.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)  Establishment: The employer did not perform the employee's medical evaluation prior to allowing employees to wear full facepiece dual cartridge respirators while performing sanding tasks with a hand-held sander.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103)  Establishment: The employer did not perform the respiratory fit testing prior to allowing employees to wear full facepiece dual cartridge respirators while performing sanding tasks with a hand-held sander.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer:  (Construction Reference 1926.103)  Establishment: The employer did not ensure through visual observation, specific instruction and communication that the respirators worn by the employees during the sanding tasks were appropriately cleaned and disinfected using appropriate measures prior to and after each use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  (Construction Reference 1926.103)  Establishment: The employer did not ensure through providing specific instruction, communication and/or visual observation that respirators worn by the employees during the sanding tasks were not only stored appropriately, but also  appropriate equipment was available to properly transport the respirators to each jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  Worksite: The bottom portions of the two (2) poles of the pump jack scaffold from which employees were performing paint grinding tasks were not set on base plates, mud sills or other firm foundation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.  Worksite: The two (2) poles of the pump jack scaffold from which employees were performing paint grinding tasks were not secured at the bottom.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Worksite: The pump jack scaffold from which employees were performing paint grinding tasks was not erected under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees working from the pump jack scaffold to perform paint grinding tasks were trained by a qualified person in the appropriate subject matter to recognized the hazards and know the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2018
Abate by
Aug 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to erect and disassemble the pump jack scaffold were trained by a competent person to recognize all the hazards associated with scaffolds use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Gil'S Painting, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343067286.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.