Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: LAZARO VIDAL ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LAZARO VIDAL ROOFING in 6115 WHITEWATER LANE, LINCOLN, NE 68529 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343080289.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lazaro Vidal Roofing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lazaro Vidal Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6115 WHITEWATER LANE
City
LINCOLN
State
NE
ZIP
68529
Mailing
2522 P ST., LINCOLN, NE 68503
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protective equipment being used did not used meet the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968.                                                                                                             The employer is failing to protect employees from struck-by hazards associated with using pneumatic nail guns without wearing approved eye protection.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed April 10, 2018 at the new residential construction house located at 6115 Whitewater Lane, Lincoln, NE where the employer has employees using pneumatic nail guns to secure the shingles they were installing on the roof without wearing any ANSI approved eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2217

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.                                                                                                            The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with performing residential construction activity while exposed to falls 6 feet or greater.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed April 10, 2018 at the new  residential construction house located at 6115 Whitewater Lane, Lincoln, NE where the employer has two employees without fall protection equipment exposed to fall hazards while installing shingling on a new residential home construction.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   The employer is failing to train employees on recognition of fall hazards and the use of fall protection equipment.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed April 10, 2018 at the new residential construction house located at 6115 Whitewater Lane, Lincoln, NE where the employer has two untrained employees without fall protection equipment exposed to fall hazards while installing shingling on a new residential home construction.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder(s) was/were not secured at its top to a rigid support, and/or a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist the employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:                                                                                                         The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with improper use of extension ladders as means of access/egress while performing residential construction activity.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed April 10, 2018 at the new residential construction house located at 6115 Whitewater Lane, Lincoln, NE where the employer has two employees using an extension ladder as means of access/egress from the roof without having extended it a minimum of 3 feet over the eave.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3880

1926.1060 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
May 18, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and/or stairways had been trained by a competent person in the nature of fall hazards in the work area:                                                                                                          The employer is failing to train employees on the recognition of hazards associated with and use of ladders as means of access/egress while performing residential construction activity.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed April 10, 2018 at the new residential construction house located at 6115 Whitewater Lane, Lincoln, NE where the employer has two inadequately trained employees using an extension ladder as means of access/egress from the roof without having extended it a minimum of 3 feet over the eave.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2000
  • · Z (S) $2772

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343080289.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.