Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LINDE WIEMANN US, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LINDE WIEMANN US, INC. in 1720 KNOX BRIDGE CROSSING ROAD, LAVONIA, GA 30553 (NAICS 336330). OSHA activity number 343083382.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Linde Wiemann US, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Linde Wiemann US, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1720 KNOX BRIDGE CROSSING ROAD
City
LAVONIA
State
GA
ZIP
30553
Mailing
1720 KNOX BRIDGE CROSSING ROAD, LAVONIA, GA 30553
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336330
Employees
123
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,282 · Current $3,769 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program.   On or about April 12, 2018: Employees operating the milling machine and using the air hose are exposed to occupational noise levels at or above 85 decibels.  The employer did not conduct noise monitoring.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3769.2
  • — Z (S) $6282

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Sep 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,282 · Current $3,769 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.   On or about April 12, 2018: Employees working in the lab and mixing acid solution once a week are required to wear a 3M Full-Face 6800 Respirator. The employer did not have a written worksite specific respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3769.2
  • — Z (S) $6282

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Sep 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.   On or about April 12, 2018: Employees working in the lab and mixing acid solution once a week are required to wear a 3M Full-Face 6800 Respirator.  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for those employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Sep 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.   On or about April 12, 2018: Employees working in the lab and mixing acid solution once a week are required to wear a 3M Full-Face 6800 Respirator. The employer did not provide a fit test for those employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace.   On or about April 12, 2018: Employees working in the lab and mixing acid solution once a week are required to wear a 3M Full-Face 6800 Respirator. The employer did not ensure employees were trained on the respirator prior to use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Aug 24, 2018
Abate by
Sep 13, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program including the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii).   On or about April 12, 2018: Employees working in the production area are exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to metalworking coolant, lubricating oils, compressed gases, isopropyl alcohol, and nitric acid.  The employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343083382.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.