Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COMFORT VIEW PRODUCTS, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of COMFORT VIEW PRODUCTS, LLC in 320 COWETA INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY BLDG. 7, SUITE C-I, NEWNAN, GA 30265 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 343084554.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Comfort View Products, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Comfort View Products, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
320 COWETA INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY BLDG. 7, SUITE C-I
City
NEWNAN
State
GA
ZIP
30265
Mailing
320 COWETA INDUSTRIAL PARKWAY BLDG. 7, SUITE C-I, NEWNAN, GA 30265
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
140
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,989 · Current $2,993 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  (a) Production Areas -  On or about April 18, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to noise hazards, in that the employer failed to implement a hearing conservation program for employees exposed to noise levels above the Action Level of 85 dBA.   An employee operating the intermediate jam mill was exposed to continuous noise at 103.5 % of the permissible daily exposure of 85 dBA (time weighted average) or an equivalent sound level of 90.3 dBA during the 424 minute sampling period on April 18, 2018. The exposure calculation included a zero increment for the 56 minutes not sampled.   An employee cutting vinyl in the processing area was exposed to continuous  noise at 66.9 % of the permissible daily exposure of 85 dBA (time weighted average) or an equivalent sound level of 87.1 dBA during the 456 minute sampling period on April 18, 2018. The exposure calculation included a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.     An employee operating a saw to cut vinyl frames on line1900 was exposed to continuous  noise at 151.8 % of the permissible daily exposure of 85 dBA (time weighted average) or an equivalent sound level of 93.0 dBA during the 449 minute sampling period on April 18, 2018. The exposure calculation included a zero increment for the 31 minutes not sampled.  An employee using a drill while installing meeting rails on line 900 was exposed to continuous  noise at 89.4 % of the permissible daily exposure of 85 dBA (time weighted average) or an equivalent sound level of 89.1 dBA during the 429 minute sampling period on April 18, 2018. The exposure calculation included a zero increment for the 51 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2993.4
  • — Z (S) $4989

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 9, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the specific energy control procedures to ensure that the procedures and requirements of this standard were followed:  (a) Production area- On or about April 12, 2018 and at times prior, the employer failed to annually review their lockout/tagout machine specific procedures to ensure that employees were correctly carrying out the energy control procedures for machines including, but not limited to, saws, milling, and welding machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343084554.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.