Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ELIZABETH'S BAKERY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ELIZABETH'S BAKERY, LLC in 13 WILLIAMS STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 311812). OSHA activity number 343092938.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elizabeth'S Bakery, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elizabeth'S Bakery, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
13 WILLIAMS STREET
City
WALLINGFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06492
Mailing
13 WILLIAM STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311812
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment.  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not conducted the Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who was required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not trained the employees on the Workplace Hazard Assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  WORKSHOP:  The rotating parts, such as (but not limited to) mixing bowl, horizontal shafts and hooks of the following mixers were unguarded:       1.  Empire mixer.   2.  Intedge table top mixer..
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  WORKSHOP: The outer sheathing of the flexible cord of the Rondo mixer was pulled away from the fitting of the attachment plug.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program, including the Globalized Harmonized System where the employee was required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) chlorox.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not maintained the safety data sheets for the  hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) bleach which was used by employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  WORKSHOP:  The employees required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) bleach were not provided with training and information in the chemical hazard communications, including the Globalized Harmonized System.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 14, 2018
Abate by
Jun 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  WORKSHOP:  An emergency eyewash station or an equivalent system was not provided where employees were required to handle corrosive chemicals, such as (but not limited to) bleach.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343092938.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.