Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PEDRO MARTINES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PEDRO MARTINES in 209 BLUFF COVE, OCEAN SPRINGS, MS 39564 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 343097036.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pedro Martines for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pedro Martines is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PEDRO MARTINES
Site address
209 BLUFF COVE
City
OCEAN SPRINGS
State
MS
ZIP
39564
Mailing
303 B AVENUE, GULFPORT, MS 39507
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.302 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2018
Abate by
Aug 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $3,326
29 CFR 1926.302(b)(3): All pneumatically driven nailers, staplers, and other similar equipment provided with automatic fastener feed, which operate at more than 100 p.s.i. pressure at the tool shall have a safety device on the muzzle to prevent the tool from ejecting fasteners, unless the muzzle is in contact with the work surface.  (a)  Second floor hallway - On or about May 18, 2018 employees were using a Hitachi NR 38 nailer that had the Safety device on the muzzle of pneumatically driven nailers, staplers, and other similar equipment did not prevent the tool from ejecting fasteners as required.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3326

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2018
Abate by
Aug 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide:  (a) Along rear side of house - On or about May 18, 2018 employees framing the new house were walking along the wooden framed scaffolding planking that was not 18 inches wide.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3880

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2018
Abate by
Aug 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) Rear side of house on second floor - On or about May 18, 2018 employees framing a new house were walking along the open rafters that is 9 feet above the lower landing without any fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3880

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343097036.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.