OKLAHOMA CITY, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: BRESHEARS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRESHEARS ENTERPRISES, INC. in 20 SOUTH MAY AVE., OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73107 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 343100343.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BRESHEARS ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- 20 SOUTH MAY AVE.
- City
- OKLAHOMA CITY
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73107
- Mailing
- 20 SOUTH MAY AVE., OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332322
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about April 19, 2018, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of eyes was not provided for employees using phosphoric acid. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with corrosive chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1330.2
- · Z (S) $2217
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about April 19, 2018, Shop Area, employer did not provide guarding for the following machines: Table saw Wysong Shear Standard 200 ton Press Brake 150 ton Press Brake Employees were exposed to the hazard of being caught in point of operation and/or being struck by rotating saw blade.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1773.6
- · Z (S) $2956
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about April 19, 2018, the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program. Employees used chemicals such as, but not limited to, phosphoric acid, welding rod containing manganese, and grind stainless steel parts. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1773.6
- · Z (S) $2956
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition: On or about April 19, 2018, all nameplates on powered industrial truck were not maintained in legible condition. Employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by falling load.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about April 19, 2018, the employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator had successfully completed training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l). Employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by falling load and/or powered industrial truck.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332322)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343100343.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.