Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AEROFIL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AEROFIL TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 225 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, SULLIVAN, MO 63080 (NAICS 561990). OSHA activity number 343104832.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aerofil Technology, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aerofil Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
225 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE
City
SULLIVAN
State
MO
ZIP
63080
Mailing
225 INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE, SULLIVAN, MO 63080
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561990
Employees
420
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,712 · Current $3,298 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section:  The specific lockout procedures for machines and equipment, such as, but not limited to, the aerosol line crimping machines, did not include specific procedural steps for shutting down and isolating, specific procedural steps for the placement and removal, and the specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3298.4
  • — Z (S) $4712

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
Jul 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:  Employees authorized to do servicing work requiring de-energization of machines, such as set-up, and replacing or servicing of parts on the crimping machine, were not trained to do lockout and tagging.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
Jul 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:  Employees authorized to do servicing work requiring de-energization of machines, such as set-up, and replacing or servicing of parts on the crimping machine, did not lockout and tag the equipment.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Aerofil Technology, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343104832.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.