Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARBIN GEHOVANY ROMERO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARBIN GEHOVANY ROMERO in 15271 LET IT BE DR, AMARILLO, TX 79101 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343106506.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Marbin Gehovany Romero for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marbin Gehovany Romero is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15271 LET IT BE DR
City
AMARILLO
State
TX
ZIP
79101
Mailing
PO BOX 3172, BOYS RANCH, TX 79010
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2018
Abate by
Jun 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.    Employees operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection were exposed to struck-by injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1663

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 23, 2018
Abate by
Jun 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):       Employees engaged in framing and decking operations were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2772

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343106506.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.