RED HILL, PA —
OSHA Inspection: SANDS AUTO GROUP
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SANDS AUTO GROUP in 602 MAIN STREET, RED HILL, PA 18073 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343107587.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANDS AUTO GROUP
- Site address
- 602 MAIN STREET
- City
- RED HILL
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18073
- Mailing
- 602 MAIN STREET, RED HILL, PA 18073
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,596 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a) Body Shop - On or about 4/24/18, the employer did not develop a written respiratory program for the worksite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $6596
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Body Shop - On or about 4/24/18, the employer did not ensure that employees who wear respirators were medically evaluated prior to their initial use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: a) Body Shop - On or about 4/24/18, employees with facial hair were using half mask respirators while performing sanding and painting operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Body Shop - On or about 4/24/18, the employer did not perform fit testing for employees who use half mask respirators prior to their initial use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) Body Shop - On or about 4/24/18, employees were not provided comprehensive, understandable training on respirator use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 M02
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck: a) Body Shop - On or about 4/24/18, employees were using two forklifts to perform body lifts off of vehicles prior to working underneath the load to position the components being worked upon.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck. a) Body Shop - On or about 4/24/18, the employer did not provide training to employees who operate forklifts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343107587.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.