ABILENE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BOGO FAMILY INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of BOGO FAMILY INC. in 917 OIL CENTER DRIVE, ABILENE, TX 79601 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 343113205.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOGO FAMILY INC.
- Site address
- 917 OIL CENTER DRIVE
- City
- ABILENE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79601
- Mailing
- 917 OIL CENTER DRIVE, ABILENE, TX 79601
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.94 A05 II
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.94(a)(5)(ii): [b]: Abrasive-blasting respirators were not worn by all abrasive-blasting operators when using silica sand in manual blasting operations where the nozzle and blast were not physically separated from the operator in an exhaust ventilated enclosure: On or about April 25, 2018, the employer did not ensure that all abrasive-blasting operators wore abrasive-blasting respirators when using silica sand in a manual blasting operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3696
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about April 25, 2018, the employer did not ensure each employee was medically evaluated prior to wearing a Comfo 2 half mask respirator to perform painting and sandblasting operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2956
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about April 25, 2018, the employer did not ensure employees who wore a tight-fitting Comfo 2 half mask respirator were fit-tested prior to painting and sandblasting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): On or about April 25, 2018 the employer did not ensure employees who wore Comfo 2 half mask respirators to perform painting and sandblasting work were trained to use them.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition: On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not ensure a Nissan forklift had an illegible nameplate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2956
1910.178 L
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks. On or about April 25, 2018, the employer did not ensure forklift operators were trained in forklift operation. a) Nissan forklift, located in the yard. b) Clark forklift located in the yard. c) Toyota forklift, located in the yard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not ensure defective forklifts were taken out of service prior to employees operating them. a) Nissan forklift, the backup alarm is inoperable. b) Clark forklift, the backup alarm and horn are inoperable. c) Toyota forklift, the backup alarm and horn are inoperable.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Assigned storage spaces for cylinders was not located away from elevators, stairs, or gangways where cylinders could not be knocked over or damaged by passing or falling objects, or subject to tampering by unauthorized persons: On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not ensure an oxygen cylinder was secured to prevent being knocked over by a passing object.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.253 B02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(iv): Valve protection caps, where cylinders were designed to accept caps, were not always in place, hand-tight, except when cylinders were in use or connected for use: On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not ensure that acetylene cylinders valve protection caps were in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not a junction box provide used to supply electric current to a box fan was installed according to instructions included in the listing and labeling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2956
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not ensure an electric panel box for the air compressor had a cover.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2956
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not ensure a strain relief was installed on a flexible cord used to supply electric current to a box fan.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced in the workplace: On or about April 25, 2018, the employer did not ensure employees were trained in the hazards of chemicals such as paints, acetone and sand containing crystalline silica in their work areas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2956
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: On or about April 25, 2018, employer did not maintain annual maintenance on portable fire extinguishers. a) Pyro Chem fire extinguisher located on the west wall in the machine shop. b) Fire buckeye Equipment fire extinguisher located on the south wall in the machine shop. c) Fire Buckeye Equipment fire extinguisher located on the east wall in the machine shop.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343113205.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.