Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPECIALTY PACKAGING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SPECIALTY PACKAGING, LLC in 47 LEGGETT STREET, EAST HARTFORD, CT 06108 (NAICS 561910). OSHA activity number 343117016.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Specialty Packaging, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Specialty Packaging, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
47 LEGGETT STREET
City
EAST HARTFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06108
Mailing
4 REVAY RD, EAST WINDSOR, CT 06088
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561910
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

16 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,109 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:    FACILITY   On, or about April 26, 2018, the emergency exit door on the East wall of the building was locked from the inside and  unable to be opened without a key.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108.5
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,109 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    FACILITY  On, or about April 26, 2018, the employer did not require employees to wear chemical aprons while maintaining the battery fluid levels on the Crown forklift truck, which contained sulfuric acid and had a pH of 1.5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108.5
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    FACILITY    On, or about April 26, 2018, the employer failed to verify through a written certification that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed when employees were exposed to sulfuric acid which required safety goggles, a face shield, chemical gloves and a chemical apron for use as personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    FACILITY    On, or about April 26, 2018, the employer did not ensure that employees use safety goggles and/ or a face shield while maintaining the battery fluid levels on the Crown forklift truck, which contained sulfuric acid and had a pH of 1.5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:   FACILITY  On, or about April 26, 2018, the employer did not require employees to wear chemical gloves while maintaining the battery fluid levels on the Crown forklift truck, which contained sulfuric acid and had a pH of 1.5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:    FACILITY    On, or about, April 26, 2018, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear a 3M,7502, half face, negative pressure respirator, while applying ARMOSEAL REXTHANE floor coating to the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    FACILITY    On, or about, April 26, 2018, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to determine an employee's ability to use a 3M, 7502, half face, negative pressure respirator, prior to requiring its use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  FACILITY    On, or about, April 26, 2018, the employer did not fit test employees that used a 3M, 7502, half face, negative pressure respirator, prior to requiring its use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2310

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:       LOADING DOCK    On, or about, April 26, 2018, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes was not available while employees maintained the battery fluid levels on the Crown forklift truck, which contained sulfuric acid and had a pH of 1.5.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    FACILITY    On, or about April 26, 2018, the employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate the Crown Lift Truck (Serial Number H12276-4) as demonstrated by the required training and evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  FACILITY  On, or about April 26, 2018, the employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operators performance was conducted at least once every three years for employees that operated the Crown Lift Truck (Serial Number H12276-4).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,109 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:   MAINTENANCE    On, or about April 26, 2018, a quad receptacle junction box  used to energize workbench lighting and hand tools was not permanently installed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108.5
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    MAINTENANCE    On, or about April 26, 2018, a yellow flexible cord connected to a quad receptacle junction box in series with a relocatable power tap were used to energize workbench lighting and tools used on the employees workstation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws:     MAINTENANCE    On, or about April 26, 2018, a yellow cord connected to a quad receptacle junction box  used to energize workbench lighting and hand tools was not provided strain relief so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     FACILITY     On, or, about April 25, 2018, the employer failed to develop and implement a written hazard communication program when employees worked with chemicals, that included, but was not limited to ARMORSEAL REXTHANE Floor Coating, which contained n-butyl acetate, which may cause dermal burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.1200 H03 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures and personal protective equipment to be used:  FACILITY  On, or about, April 26, 2018, the employer failed to train employees on the chemical hazards and personal protective equipment required when working with the CROWN LIFT TRUCK, which contained sulfuric acid and required chemical gloves, eye goggles and face shield while maintaining the fluid level of the battery.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Specialty Packaging, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343117016.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.