LUBBOCK, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: MANUEL TREJO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANUEL TREJO in 4915 KEMPER ST., LUBBOCK, TX 79416 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343118527.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANUEL TREJO
- Site address
- 4915 KEMPER ST.
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79416
- Mailing
- 836 MAIN ST., WOLFFORTH, TX 79382
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents. On or about April 27, 2018, employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1663
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On or about April 27, 2018, employees engaged in roofing work without a personal fall arrest system were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2217
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about April 27, 2018, employees had not been trained to recognize hazards related to falls and the procedures to follow that would minimize those hazards while performing roofing work, at a height of over 6 feet, without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about April 27, 2018, employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2217
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343118527.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.