Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAFMAC CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAFMAC CONSTRUCTION, LLC. in 1728 SOUTH 2ND STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19148 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343125092.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rafmac Construction, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rafmac Construction, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1728 SOUTH 2ND STREET
City
PHILADELPHIA
State
PA
ZIP
19148
Mailing
30 KENT ROAD, UPPER DARBY, PA 19082
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2018
Abate by
Oct 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  a) Jobsite: The employer did not have a safe means to access the scaffold for his employees. Employees had to access and egress the scaffold by climbing a scaffold ladder on the front of the scaffold then enter and egress through crossbraces.  b) Jobsite: The employer did not have a safe means to access the scaffold for his employees. Employees had to access and egress the scaffold by climbing over a roof edge, that was approximately 6 feet from the bottom of the scaffold.   Condition was observed on or about 28 MAR 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2018
Abate by
Oct 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee shall be protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  a) Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls while working from a scaffold side bracket at heights greater than 10 feet without the use of a fall protection system.  b) Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls while working on a scaffold at heights greater than 10 feet without the use of a fall protection system installed adequately. The top working level had a section used to receive materials where the guardrail was lowered exposing employees to falls.    Condition was observed on or about 28 MAR 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 F06

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 25, 2018
Abate by
Oct 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $25,867 · Current $25,867
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6):  a) Jobsite: The employer allowed employees to work from a scaffold that was erected with a 110 volt power line passing through the scaffold in direct proximity to where employees were performing masonry activities.  b) Jobsite: The employer allowed employees to access the scaffold via a scaffold ladder that was installed in the front of the scaffold and approximately 1 foot from the 220 volt and 110 volt power lines.  Condition was observed on or about 28 MAR 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $25867

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343125092.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.