Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROOFBLOK LIMITED

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ROOFBLOK LIMITED in 60 INDUSTRIAL ROWE, GARDNER, MA 01440 (NAICS 327331). OSHA activity number 343126777.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Roofblok Limited — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roofblok Limited is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROOFBLOK LIMITED
Site address
60 INDUSTRIAL ROWE
City
GARDNER
State
MA
ZIP
01440
Mailing
60 INDUSTRIAL ROWE, GARDNER, MA 01440
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327331
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2019
Abate by
Jan 16, 2019
Penalty
Initial $415 · Current $415
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  As of January 3, 2019, the employer had not certified that the abatement was completed for five serious violations, Citation 1, Items 1a, 1b, 2, 3a and 3b, from Inspection 1312677, issued on September 19, 2018, with a final order date of October 19, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $415
  • — Z (O) $415

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2019
Abate by
Jan 16, 2019
Penalty
Initial $415 · Current $415
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  As of January 3, 2019, the employer had not submitted documentation demonstrating that the abatement was completed for four serious violations, Citation 1, Items 1a, 1b, 2 and 3b, from inspection 1312677, issued on September 19, 2018, with a final order date of October 19, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $415
  • — Z (O) $415

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,574 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section:    At the sandblasting machine, 60 Industrial Rowe Gardner, MA: On or about April 27, 2018, the employer did not develop and document energy control procedures and employees did not utilize energy control procedures while performing maintenance work on a conveyor with a broken belt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2574
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:    In the facility at 60 Industrial Rowe Gardner, MA: On or about April 27, 2018, the employer did not provide training on the energy control program to employees working on the sandblasting machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,574 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    At the sandblasting machine, 60 Industrial Rowe Gardner, MA: On or about April 27, 2018, the employer did not ensure one or more methods of machine guarding to protect employees from hazards on the sandblasting conveyor system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2574
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,434 · Current $2,247 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    In the facility at 60 Industrial Rowe Gardner, MA: On or about April 27, 2018, the employer did not implement and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees using a variety of hazardous material including, but not limited to paver material containing crystalline silicon dioxide and cast steel abrasive containing iron, manganese, silicon, carbon, chromium, and nickel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2247
  • — Z (S) $4434

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    In the facility at 60 Industrial Rowe Gardner, MA: On or about April 27, 2018, the employer did not provide training to employees on the hazardous material in the workplace including, but not limited to paver material containing crystalline silicon dioxide and cast steel abrasive containing iron, manganese, silicon, carbon, chromium, and nickel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Roofblok Limited's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343126777.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.