KENOSHA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: CHRIS LOPEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CHRIS LOPEZ in 5424 12TH AVE., KENOSHA, WI 53144 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343129003.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHRIS LOPEZ
- Site address
- 5424 12TH AVE.
- City
- KENOSHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53144
- Mailing
- 2224 S. 33RD ST., MILWAUKEE, WI 53215
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violation that was issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using head protection when working under persons, material and equipment.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1663
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end: (a) The employer did not ensure that a ladder jack scaffold platform did not extend further than 18 inches past its support. The employees were using this platform to install roofing materials and were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: (a) The employer did not ensure that a means of access was provided for employees who were working from a ladder jack scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when working from a ladder jack scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.454 A
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in hazards associated with scaffolds and the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): (a) The employer did not ensure that a safety program was implemented that called for frequent and regular inspections of the worksite.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- May 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladder(s) with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately removed: (a) The employer did not ensure that a portable ladder used as a support for a ladder jack scaffold had all components including, but not limited to, the feet on the bottom of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Chris Lopez
View Chris Lopez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343129003.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.