WATERBURY, CT —
OSHA Inspection: J. PRINCE CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of J. PRINCE CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 1017 SOUTH MAIN STREET, WATERBURY, CT 06706 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343129284.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J. PRINCE CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 1017 SOUTH MAIN STREET
- City
- WATERBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06706
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 11383, WATERBURY, CT
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Aug 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 1017 South Main Street, Waterbury, CT 06706 Abatement verification and certification for Citation 01, Item 001b issued on June 4, 2018 that became a final order on July 25, 2018 was not received within 10 calendar days (by July 8, 2018) following the Abatement Due Date (June 28, 2018).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working on the residential roof were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the residential roof at a height above 6 feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343129284.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.