CEDAR GROVE, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: THE CANTERBURY AT CEDAR GROVE REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE CANTERBURY AT CEDAR GROVE REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER LLC in 398 POMPTON AVE, CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 343129375.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 398 POMPTON AVE
- City
- CEDAR GROVE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07009
- Mailing
- 398 POMPTON AVE, CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 191
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,239 · Current $8,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: a) Facility The employer did not establish a written exposure control plan for employees exposed to needlestick injuries and for workers required to clean up blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). Violation occurred on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $8000
- · Z (S) $9239
1910.1030 C01 IV B
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure: a) Facility The employer did not document the review, consideration and implementation of safer medical devices used by nurses during medication administration. Employees are exposed to needlestick injuries and required to clean up blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM). Violation occurred on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not prepare an exposure determination: a) Facility The employer did not prepare an exposure determination while employees are exposed to blood and other potentially infectious materials during resident care. Violation occurred on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.7 B03
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,848 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): When an injury or illness involved one or more days away from work, the employer did not record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log with a check mark in the space for cases involving days away and an entry of the number of calendar days away from work in the number of days away column: a) Facility The employer did not record the following workplace injury correctly on the OSHA 300 Log for calendar year 2018: 1) On or about 04/05/18, Central Supply - An employee sustained a hernia and received 11 days away from work. The employer did not enter the injury as days away from work and did not enter the number of days away. Violation observed on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $1848
1904.7 B05
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,848 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(5): The employer did not enter a check mark in the box for cases where the employee received medical treatment but remained at work and was not transferred or restricted: a) Facility The employer did not record the following workplace injury correctly on the OSHA 300 Log for calendar year 2018: 1) On or about 04/16/18, Kitchen- An employee sustained a burn on the right forearm and received medical treatment. The employer did not enter the injury as an other recordable case. Violation observed on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $1848
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343129375.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.