Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: THE CANTERBURY AT CEDAR GROVE REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE CANTERBURY AT CEDAR GROVE REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER LLC in 398 POMPTON AVE, CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 343129375.

Watch THE Canterbury AT Cedar Grove Rehabilitation AND Care Center LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for THE Canterbury AT Cedar Grove Rehabilitation AND Care Center LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
398 POMPTON AVE
City
CEDAR GROVE
State
NJ
ZIP
07009
Mailing
398 POMPTON AVE, CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
191
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 191 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $9239.00 · Current $8000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    a) Facility    The employer did not establish a written exposure control plan for employees exposed to needlestick injuries and for workers required to clean up blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM).    Violation occurred on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8000
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.1030 C01 IV B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 191 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)(B): The review and update of the exposure control plan did not document annually consideration and implementation of appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure:    a) Facility        The employer did not document the review, consideration and implementation of safer medical devices used by nurses during medication administration.  Employees are exposed to needlestick injuries and required to clean up blood and other potentially infectious materials (OPIM).         Violation occurred on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 191 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i): The employer having employees with occupational exposure did not prepare an exposure determination:     a) Facility    The employer did not prepare an exposure determination while employees are exposed to blood and other potentially infectious materials during resident care.    Violation occurred on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.7 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 191 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1848.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): When an injury or illness involved one or more days away from work, the employer did not record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log with a check mark in the space for cases involving days away and an entry of the number of calendar days away from work in the number of days away column:    a) Facility        The employer did not record the following workplace injury correctly on the OSHA 300 Log for calendar year 2018:    1) On or about 04/05/18, Central Supply - An employee sustained a hernia and received 11 days away from work.  The employer did not enter the injury as days away from work and did not enter the number of days away.      Violation observed on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1848

1904.7 B05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 191 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1848.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(5): The employer did not enter a check mark in the box for cases where the employee received medical treatment but remained at work and was not transferred or restricted:    a) Facility    The employer did not record the following workplace injury correctly on the OSHA 300 Log for calendar year 2018:    1) On or about 04/16/18, Kitchen- An employee sustained a burn on the right forearm and received medical treatment.  The employer did not enter the injury as an other recordable case.    Violation observed on or about 05/01/2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $1848

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343129375.