Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SABEL STEEL SERVICE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SABEL STEEL SERVICE, INC. in 1968 TAYLOR RD., DOTHAN, AL 36302 (NAICS 423510). OSHA activity number 343148623.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sabel Steel Service, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sabel Steel Service, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1968 TAYLOR RD.
City
DOTHAN
State
AL
ZIP
36302
Mailing
1968 TAYLOR RD., DOTHAN, AL 36302
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423510
Employees
235
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,147 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):  a) Bay 1 - E-084 HTC Shear 1/2"; On or about May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies, in that the employer failed to ensure that the machine specific lock out procedures had sufficient detail and adequate guidance that authorized employee(s) could clearly understand how to safely and effectively utilize hazardous energy control measures for the machine, while performing servicing and/or maintenance activities. Employees were required to work on the equipment with procedures that were generic, vague, and did not; 1) State how and where to shut down the machine; 2) State how and where to apply the lock; and 3) State how to restore service.  b) Bay 1 - E-145 Cincinnati Shear 1/4"; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to ensure that the machine specific lock out procedures had sufficient detail and adequate guidance that authorized employee(s) could clearly understand how to safely and effectively utilize hazardous energy control measures for the machine, while performing servicing and/or maintenance activities. Employees were required to work on the equipment with procedures that were generic, vague, and did not; 1) State how and where to shut down the machine; 2) State how and where to apply the lock; and 3) State how to restore service.  c) Bay 1 - E-084 Abrasive Saw; On or about May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies, such as but not limited to electrical  in that, the employer failed to ensure that the machine specific lock out procedures had sufficient detail and adequate guidance that authorized employee(s) could clearly understand how to safely and effectively utilize hazardous energy control measures for the machine, while performing servicing and/or maintenance activities. Employees were required to work on the equipment with procedures that were generic, vague, and did not; 1) State how and where to shut down the machine; 2) State how and where to apply the lock; and 3) State how to restore service.  d) Bay 2 - E-113 Marvel Bandsaw; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to ensure that the machine specific lock out procedures had sufficient detail and adequate guidance that authorized employee(s) could clearly understand how to safely and effectively utilize hazardous energy control measures for the machine, while performing servicing and/or maintenance activities. Employees were required to work on the equipment with procedures that were generic, vague, and did not; 1) State how and where to shut down the machine; 2) State how and where to apply the lock; and 3) State how to restore service.  e) Outside in Beam Bay in Shed - E-152 Metalizer Bandsaw; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to ensure that the machine specific lock out procedures had sufficient detail and adequate guidance that authorized employee(s) could clearly understand how to safely and effectively utilize hazardous energy control measures for the machine, while performing servicing and/or maintenance activities. Employees were required to work on the equipment with procedures that were generic, vague, and did not; 1) State how and where to shut down the machine; 2) State how and where to apply the lock; and 3) State how to restore service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9147

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 12 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,147 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  a) Bay 1 - E-084 HTC Shear 1/2"; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  b) Bay 1 - E-145 Cincinnati Shear 1/4"; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  c) Bay 1 - E-084 Abrasive Saw; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed conduct to and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  d) Bay 1 Sheet & Plate Side - 117 P&H 10 Ton Crane; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  e) Bay 1 on 20' material side - E-115 Ace 10 Ton Crane; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  f) Bay 2 - E-113 Marvel Bandsaw; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  g) North End of Bay 2 - E-118 P&H 5 Ton Crane; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  h) South end of Bay 2 - E-119 Stahl 5 Ton Crane; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  i) North end of Bay 3 - E-121 Robbison - Meyers 5 Ton Crane; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  j)  South End of Bay 3 - E-122 Robbison - Meyers 5 Ton Crane; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  k) Outside in Beam Bay in Shed - E-152 Metalizer Bandsaw; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.  l) Outside in Beam Bay - E-114 Yale 5 Ton OET crane; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to potential hazardous energies in that, the employer failed to conduct and document periodic inspections of the lockout/tagout or energy control procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $9147

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,147 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee had not received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  a) At Sabel Steel, Dothan, Alabama :  On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were authorized to lock out equipment such as but not limited to Hydmech H22-A Bandsaw without first ensuring those employees were trained on how to do lockout/tagout on the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $9147

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Each affected employee was not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  a) At Sabel Steel, Dothan, Alabama :  On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed his employees to potential hazardous energies in that operators and other employees were not informed of purpose and use when equipment such as but not limited to the Hydmech H22-A Bandsaw has been locked out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,147 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): Complete periodic inspections of the crane were not performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(b) of this section:  a) Bay 1: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to conduct periodic inspections of the 10 Ton Overhead Bridge Crane, at least every 12 months as required by the standard.  b) Bay 2: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to conduct periodic inspections of the 5 Ton Overhead/Underhung Bridge Crane, at least every 12 months as required by the standard.  c) Bay 3: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to conduct periodic inspections of the 5 Ton Overhead/Underhung Bridge Crane, at least every 12 months as required by the standard.  d) Bay 4: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to conduct periodic inspections of the 10 Ton Overhead Bridge Crane, at least every 12 months as required by the standard.  e) Outside: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to conduct periodic inspections of the 5 Ton Overhead Bridge Crane, at least every 12 months as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9147

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,805 · Current $4,225 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(d): Sling(s) and fastenings were not inspected by a competent person each day, before being used, for damage or defects.  Damaged or defective slings were not immediately removed from service.  a) At Sabel Steel, Dothan, Alabama: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that a damaged wire-rope sling was removed from service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4225
  • — Z (S) $12805

1910.184 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(f)(1): Wire-rope slings did not have permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer that indicated the recommended safe working load for the type(s) of hitch(es) used, the angle upon which it is based, and the number of legs if more than one:  a) Bay 1: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to ensure that a wire-rope sling being used on the 10 Ton Overhead crane in bay 1 had an identification tag.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 E03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(ii): The employer did not make and maintain a record of the most recent month in which each alloy steel chain sling was thoroughly inspected, and did not make such record available for examination:  a) At Sabel Steel, Dothan, Alabama : On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards in that the employer failed to document and maintain records of alloy steel chain sling inspections as specified in the regulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B02 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,317 · Current $2,414 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(ii): Assigned storage spaces for cylinders were not located where cylinders could not be knocked over:  a)  Bay 3 near burning table:  On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that a compressed gas cylinder not in use and identified to contain Liquefied Petroleum Gas was not secured.  b)  Bay 3 near burning table:  On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that a compressed gas cylinder that is in use and identified to contain Liquefied Petroleum Gas was not secured.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2414
  • — Z (S) $7317

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour.   a) Torch Cutting Area: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards in that, oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials such as Liquefied Petroleum Gas as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B05 II I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,147 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(5)(ii)(I): Cylinders were not kept far enough away from the actual welding or cutting operation so that sparks, hot slag or flame would not reach them, or fire resistant shields were not provided.  a) Torch Cutting Area: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards in that oxygen cylinders and fuel-gas cylinders such as Liquefied Petroleum Gas were not kept away from cutting operations, hot slag, sparks and/or flame as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $9147

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,147 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by this standard, live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the following means:  a) Back side of Cincinnati 3/8" Shear machine: On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to electrical hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around a 480 Volt, 3 Phase MCC Motor Control Cabinet with an open door that is damaged and cannot be locked.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $9147

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $25,609 · Current $12,934 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a) Bay 2 - Hydmech H22-A Bandsaw; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to change the blade of the Hydmech H22-A Bandsaw and the employer had not developed, documented and was not utilizing a hazardous energy control procedure.    b) Bay 2 - Hydmech H22-A Bandsaw; On May 9, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to clean debris from the auger of the Hydmech H22-A Bandsaw and the employer had not developed, documented and was not utilizing a hazardous energy control procedure.    SABLE STEEL SERVICES, INC. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1910.147(C)(4)(I), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 1007083, CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 2 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON MAY 22, 2015, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 2811 DAY STREET, MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36103.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12934
  • — Z (R) $25609

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 2, 2018
Abate by
Nov 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years:  a) At Sabel Steel, Dothan, Alabama : On May 9, 2018 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards in that employees were allowed to operate powered industrial trucks without being evaluated at least once every three years as specified in the regulation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Sabel Steel Service, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343148623.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.