Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOE YODER

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOE YODER in 103 KYDEN DRIVE, MARSHALL, IL 62441 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343160743.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JOE Yoder — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JOE Yoder is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOE YODER
Site address
103 KYDEN DRIVE
City
MARSHALL
State
IL
ZIP
62441
Mailing
18711 N. 175TH STREET, OBLONG, IL 62449
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,370 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    On or about May 15, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards, on a commercial construction site in Marshall, Illinois.  The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1370
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about May 15, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards, on a commercial construction site in Marshall, Illinois.  The employer did not have a competent person conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections at the construction site.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:    On or about May 15, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 13 feet without fall protection while working from a supported scaffold, which was lifted by a rough terrain forklift, on a commercial construction site in Marshall, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1940
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  On or about May 15, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 13 feet without fall protection while working from a supported scaffold, which was lifted by a rough terrain forklift, on a commercial construction site in Marshall, Illinois.   Employees were not provided scaffold training.  This training would include:    a.         Nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards, and falling object hazards in the work area, b.         Correct procedures for dealing with electrical hazards and for erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection systems and falling object protection systems used, c.         Proper use of the scaffold, and the proper handling of material on the scaffold,  d.         The maximum intended load and the load-carrying capacities of the scaffold used, e.         Any other pertinent requirements of this subpart, L  Scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about May 15, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 13 feet without fall protection, on a commercial construction site in Marshall, Illinois.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1940
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2018
Abate by
Jul 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about May 15, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 13 feet without fall protection, on a commercial construction site in Marshall, Illinois.  Employees were not provided construction safety training, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View JOE Yoder's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343160743.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.