Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BARONE CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BARONE CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 100 E. LANCASTER AVE. PARKING DECK D, WYNNEWOOD, PA 19096 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343160867.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Barone Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Barone Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 E. LANCASTER AVE. PARKING DECK D
City
WYNNEWOOD
State
PA
ZIP
19096
Mailing
10 QUARRY RD., DARBY, PA 19023
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)  a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, the employer required employees to wear loose-fitting and tight-fitting respirators when using caulk cutting power tools to dry-cut caulk from cement, but the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program which included worksite specific procedures.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2956
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,250
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103).    a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, the employer required employees to wear loose-fitting and tight-fitting respirators when using caulk cutting power tools to dry cut caulk from cement, but the employer did not provide a medical evaluation before use.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1250
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (Construction Reference 1926.103).  a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, the employer required employees to wear tight-fitted respirators when using hand powered saws to dry cut caulk from cement, but the employer did not ensure employees were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provided effective training to employees who are required to use respirators:  a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, the employer required employees to wear loose-fitting and tight-fitting respirators when using hand powered saws to dry cut caulk from cement, but the employer did not ensure employees were provided effective training to employees.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.    a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, employees used hand powered saws to dry cut caulk from cement.  The employer did not properly implement the required engineering controls and work practices as specified in Table 1 and the employer did not assess exposure to silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section, exposing employees to silica inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1250
  • — C (S) $2956
  • — Z (S) $2956

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, employees used hand powered saws to dry cut caulk from cement, but the employer did not assess the exposure of each employee.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:    a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, employees used hand powered saws to dry cut caulk from cement, the employer produced a written exposure plan but did not implement the plan on the site, exposing employees to silica inhalation hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 9, 2018
Abate by
Jul 19, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica:    a) Parking Deck D - on or about May 21, 2018, the employer did not ensure that each employee performing caulk removal on a concrete surface could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the health hazards associated with their exposure to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343160867.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.