Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STEWART SYSTEMS BAKING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of STEWART SYSTEMS BAKING, LLC in 808 STEWART DRIVE, PLANO, TX 75074 (NAICS 333241). OSHA activity number 343161097.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Stewart Systems Baking, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stewart Systems Baking, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
808 STEWART DRIVE
City
PLANO
State
TX
ZIP
75074
Mailing
808 STEWART DRIVE, PLANO, TX 75074
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333241
Employees
140
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2018
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,147 · Current $4,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized struck-by hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees:    (a) On or about August 15, 2018 in the manufacturing area employees operated a blue forklift without the use of safety belts, exposing employees to crush-by hazards;    (b) On or about August 15, 2018 in the painting area employees operated a Toyota forklift without the use of safety belts, exposing employees to crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $9147

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2018
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,805 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a) On or about August 14, 2018 and at times prior thereto employees in the fabrication area were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards while using an unguarded ACRA Mill drill press, serial number 1212752;    (b) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto employees in the fabrication area were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards while using an unguarded Clausing 200 drill press, model 2287, serial number 530420;    (c) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto employees in the fabrication area were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards while using an unguarded Clausing 200 drill press, model 2287, serial number 530421;    (d) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto employees in the fabrication area were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards while using an unguarded Clausing 200  drill press, model 2287, serial number 530422;    (e) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto employees in the fabrication area were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards while using an unguarded Voya drill press, model RE2-1300D, machine #OA5-12391;    (f) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto employees in the fabrication area were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards while using an unguarded Cleereman drill press.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $12805

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2018
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,317 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees in the paint area who are required to wear respirators, exposing employees to respiratory hazards;    (b) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto the employer did not provide medical evaluations for welders who voluntarily wear a half-faced respirator, exposing employees to respiratory hazards;
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7317

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2018
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,317 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0435

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:    ((a) On or about August 15, 3028 and at times prior thereto the employer did not ensure that painters, who are required to use half-face respirators, are fit tested prior to the initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7317

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2018
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,317 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0435

29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:    (a) On or about August 15, 2018 and at times prior thereto painters using half-faced respirators could not demonstrate knowledge of the general requirements of the respiratory standard including medical evaluations and fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7317

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2018
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,317 · Current $3,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0435

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a) On or about August 15, 2018 and at time prior thereto, employees in the paint area using hazards chemicals such as Parker Blue Aqualac were not provided with effective information or training on that chemical, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $7317

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2018
Abate by
Oct 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  (a) On or about August 15, 2018 employees using N-95 respirators and half-faced respirators on a voluntary basis have not been informed of the information present in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134 exposing employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Stewart Systems Baking, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343161097.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.