LONG BEACH, MS —
OSHA Inspection: FRANCO SANCHEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANCO SANCHEZ in 923 EAST BEACH BLVD, LONG BEACH, MS 39560 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 343170254.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRANCO SANCHEZ
- Site address
- 923 EAST BEACH BLVD
- City
- LONG BEACH
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39560
- Mailing
- 263 HOLLEY ST., BILOXI, MS 39530
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide: (a) Around perimeter of building - On or about May 15, 2018 employees framing a new house on a raised foundation were working from the wooden scaffolding planking that is 5 5/8 inch wide and not the 18 inches required.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) Perimeter of raised foundation - On or about May 15, 2018 employees framing a single family dwelling on a raised foundation were not protected from falling 106" to the ground with a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: (a) East and west side of framed house - On or about May 15, 2018 employees framing the raised house gained access to the first floor by climbing up and down a step ladder that was closed and leaning against the exterior framed floor and did not extend 3 feet past nor was it tied off.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) Throughout the job site - On or about May 15, 2018 employees framing a new house that is on a raised foundation were working below without any type of head protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) Throughout the job site - On or about May 15, 2018 employees framing a new house using air nail guns were not protected with the use of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.304 D
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe: (a) South side of house - On or about May 15, 2018 employees building a new house were using a Dewalt electrical power saw that had the blade guard pinned in the open position exposing the lower side of the blade.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jul 31, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: (a) West and east side of framed house - On or about May 15, 2018 employees gained access to the first floor and scaffold walkway using step ladders that were closed and leaning against the house framed first floor.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Franco Sanchez
View Franco Sanchez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343170254.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.