Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INTEGRATED AUTOMATION SYSTEMS

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of INTEGRATED AUTOMATION SYSTEMS in 6464 METRO CT., BEDFORD HEIGHTS, OH 44146 (NAICS 327215). OSHA activity number 343171088.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Integrated Automation Systems — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Integrated Automation Systems is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6464 METRO CT.
City
BEDFORD HEIGHTS
State
OH
ZIP
44146
Mailing
6464 METRO CT., BEDFORD HEIGHTS, OH 44146
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327215
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Nov 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,543 · Current $5,543
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  Note:  Applies where all employees are expected to fight fires.    On or about May 17, 2018, employees working in the production area of the facility were not trained on fire extinguisher use for incipient stage fires on an annual basis.    a)  Note the employer may exercise one of the following options:     1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.     2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).     3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5543
  • — C (S) $5543
  • — Z (S) $5543

1910.178 L01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Nov 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,390 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   On or about May 17, 2018, untrained employees were allowed to operate powered industrial vehicles (e.g. the company's Hyster fork truck) at the site without having received formal instruction, including operator evaluation to determine the retention of the information.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $7390
  • — Z (S) $7390

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,543 · Current $5,543
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2):  Frequent inspection. The following items were not inspected for defects at intervals as defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii) of this section or as specifically indicated, including observation during operation for any defects which might appear between regular inspections. All deficiencies such as listed were not carefully examined and determination made as to whether they constitute a safety hazard:      On or about May 17, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that the company's overhead bridge(s) crane was inspected for defects on a daily basis for items including but not limited to; all functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment, deterioration or leakage of air or hydraulic systems and hooks. Employees performing crane operations are not protected from potential hazards created by accidental load disengagement.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $5543
  • — C (S) $5543
  • — Z (S) $5543

1910.179 N03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
29 CFR 1910.179(n)(3)(i): The load was not well secured and properly balanced in the sling or lifting device before it was lifted more than a few inches:     The load was not secured in the lifting device.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12934
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.184 C06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(6): Slings were not securely attached to their loads:     A chain sling was not securely attached to a load.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.184 C09

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(9): Employee(s) were not kept clear of load(s) suspended, or about to be lifted by sling(s):  On or about May 11, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that an employee tasked with lifting steel plates weighing in excess of 1500 lbs. was protected from struck by and crushing hazards when working in proximity to a suspended load.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Oct 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
29 CFR 1910.184(d): Sling(s), fastenings and attachments were not inspected by a competent person each day, before being used, for damage or defects:       On or about May 17, 2018, the employer did not ensure that slings, fastenings and attachments were inspected by a competent person each day, before being used, for damage or defects.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12934
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Oct 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel chain slings did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:  On or about May 17, 2018, an alloy steel chain sling used by an employee(s) to suspend a load (steel plate weighting approx. 1500 lbs.) lacked permanently affixed identification.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Nov 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,390 · Current $7,390
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     The employer did not develop, implement, or maintain a written hazard communication program at the site. Chemicals used at the site include but are not limited; various IG gases, oils and lubricants, solvents and paint, acetylene, etc.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7390
  • — C (S) $7390
  • — Z (S) $7390

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Nov 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:     Employees were not trained on the hazardous chemicals utilized in the workplace. Chemicals used at the site include; but are not limited to, various IG gases, oils and lubricants, solvents and paint, acetylene, etc..
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Nov 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The employer did not train employees regarding the new label elements and safety data sheets format.     On or about May 17, 2018, the employer failed to provide training or information to employees working with hazardous chemicals on the details outline in the new hazard communication standard which encompasses the Global Harmonization System (GHS).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Nov 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,848 · Current $1,848
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use OSHA 300, 300-A, and 301 forms, or equivalent forms, for recordable injuries and illnesses:     On or about May 17, 2018, injury and illness forms or an equivalent form, were not maintained at the facility.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $1848
  • — C (O) $1848
  • — Z (O) $1848

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2018
Abate by
Nov 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,240 · Current $9,240
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours:      On or about May 17, 2018, the employer did not report the hospitalization of an employee to OSHA.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $9240
  • — C (O) $9240
  • — Z (O) $9240

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343171088.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.