CLAYTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: EATON COMPRESSOR & FABRICATION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EATON COMPRESSOR & FABRICATION, INC. in 1000 CASS DR., CLAYTON, OH 45315 (NAICS 333912). OSHA activity number 343172789.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EATON COMPRESSOR & FABRICATION, INC.
- Site address
- 1000 CASS DR.
- City
- CLAYTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45315
- Mailing
- 1000 CASS DR., CLAYTON, OH 45315
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333912
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,497 · Current $1,834 Reduced
04402590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer did not establish or implement a written respiratory program for employees required to wear a half-face tight fitting respirator with cartridges when spraying primer and toner containing n-butyl acetate (respiratory irritation), and xylene (depression of central nervous system).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1834
- — Z (S) $5497
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04402590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: The employer did not conduct air monitoring for chemicals including, but not limited to, xylene (nervous system suppression) and n-butyl acetate (respiratory irritation) before requiring employees to wear a tight fitting respirator for those chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Employees were not provided with a medical evaluation prior to being required to use a tight-fitting half face cartridge respirator when spraying primer and toner in the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
04402590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: The employer did not ensure that employees required to wear a tight-fitting half face respirator while spraying primer and toner containing n-butyl acetate (respiratory irritation, skin irritation) and xylene (depression of central nervous system) in the paint booth were provided with fit tests.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: The employer did not ensure employees required to wear a tight-fitting half face respirator while spraying primer and toner in the spray booth were provided with respirator training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,497 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: The employer did not obtain the manufacturer's approval before removing the backrest of the Toyota forklift used in the spray booth area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5497
1910.178 O01
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,398 · Current $1,833 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(o)(1): The employer did not ensure that only stable or safely arranged loads were handled: The employer did not require employees moving compressor tanks with a forklift to ensure the loads were stable.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1833
- — Z (S) $4398
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,398 · Current $1,833 Reduced
04402590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, n-butyl acetate (respiratory irritation, skin irritation), and xylene (depression of central nervous system).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1833
- — Z (S) $4398
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200; b) operations where hazardous chemicals are present; c) location and availability of the written hazard communication program; d) physical and chemical hazards of chemicals in the work area; e) methods to detect the presence of hazardous chemicals in the work area; The employer did not provide training in accordance with the Hazard Communication Standard, employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, Xylene (nervous system suppression) and n-butyl acetate (skin and respiratory irritation).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 14, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 1, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: A written certification of a hazard assessment had not been completed by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Eaton Compressor & Fabrication, INC.
View Eaton Compressor & Fabrication, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333912)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343172789.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.