SANTA RITA, GU —
OSHA Inspection: BME & SONS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BME & SONS, INC. in ROUTE 5 EAST, SANTA RITA, GU 96915 (NAICS 237130). OSHA activity number 343182291.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BME & SONS, INC.
- Site address
- ROUTE 5 EAST
- City
- SANTA RITA
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96915
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 24402, BARRIGADA, GU 96921
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237130
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 30, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,628 · Current $2,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: Route 5 eastbound: The employer did not ensure that each flagger was trained to recognize hazards associated with flagger procedures and duties. Flaggers were exposed to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2539.6
- — Z (S) $3628
1926.200 G01
- Issued
- May 30, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,837 · Current $3,386 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(1): Construction areas were not posted with legible traffic signs at points of hazards: Route 5 eastbound: The employer did not post advanced warning signs in the eastbound direction that conforms to Section 6G.03 of the MUTCD which requires: a general message that work is taking place, supply information about highway conditions, and indicate how motor vehicle traffic can move through the temporary traffic control zone. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3385.9
- — Z (S) $4837
1926.201 A
- Issued
- May 30, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,837 · Current $3,386 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.201(a): Signaling by flaggers and the use of flaggers, including warning garments worn by flaggers did not conform to Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, (1988 Edition, Revision 3 or the Millennium Edition): Route 5 eastbound: The employer did not ensure that flaggers were stationed on the shoulder adjacent to the traffic being controlled or in a barricaded lane. Flaggers were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3385.9
- — Z (S) $4837
More inspections at BME & Sons, INC.
View BME & Sons, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237130)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343182291.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.