Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GATEWAY WAREHOUSES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GATEWAY WAREHOUSES, INC. in 3250 PERKINS AVE, CLEVELAND, OH 44114 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 343187019.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gateway Warehouses, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gateway Warehouses, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3250 PERKINS AVE
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44114
Mailing
3250 PERKINS AVE, CLEVELAND, OH 44114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493110
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2018
Abate by
Jul 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:    On or about May 25, 2018, the employer failed to provide portable fire extinguisher training.      Note the employer may exercise one of the following options:     1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.     2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).     3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.6
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2018
Abate by
Aug 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,218 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    On or about May 25, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that all powered industrial trucks were in good work condition. The powered industrial truck #Y2 was in disrepair; the powered industrial truck did not have a working horn, the front lights were not in working condition, and the rearview mirror was missing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2217.6
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2018
Abate by
Aug 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:    On or about May 25, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that powered industrial truck inspections were being conducted before being placed into service. Powered industrial trucks were being placed into service which were not inspected on a daily/ per-shift basis. Powered industrial trucks were being placed into service which were found to be in disrepair. The powered industrial truck #Y2 did not have a working horn, the front lights were not in working condition, and the rearview mirror was missing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2018
Abate by
Aug 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,434 · Current $2,660 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about May 25, 2018, the employer failed to have a written hazard communication program for the workplace. Employees routinely use hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to, liquid propane fuel gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2660.4
  • — Z (S) $4434

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2018
Abate by
Aug 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:    On or about May 25, 2018, the employer failed to verify and certify that a workplace hazard assessment had been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Gateway Warehouses, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343187019.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.