BETHEL, ME —
OSHA Inspection: GOULD ACADEMY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GOULD ACADEMY in 39 CHURCH ST, BETHEL, ME 04217 (NAICS 611110). OSHA activity number 343195962.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GOULD ACADEMY
- Site address
- 39 CHURCH ST
- City
- BETHEL
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04217
- Mailing
- 39 CHURCH ST, BETHEL, ME 04217
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 611110
- Employees
- 117
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1001 J04 IV
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,315 · Current $4,158 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(4)(iv): At the entrance to mechanical rooms/areas in which employees reasonably can be expected to enter and which contain ACM and/or PACM, the building owner did not post signs which identify the material which is present, its location, and appropriate work practices which, if followed, will ensure that ACM and/or PACM will not be disturbed: Establishment - Signs to identify areas which contain material containing asbestos containing materials (ACM) or presumed asbestos containing materials (PACM) were not posted at the entrance to locations such as but not limited to Bingham Hall mechanical room.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4157.5
- — Z (S) $8315
1910.1001 J05 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(i): The employer did not affix or post labels or signs on identified ACM and/or PACM that had been previously installed, so that employees would be notified of what materials contained ACM and/or PACM. The employer did not attach such labels in areas where they would be clearly noticed by employees who were likely to be exposed: Establishment - The employer did not ensure that labels were affixed on asbestos containing materials (ACM) such as but not limited to the material on the boiler and boiler pipes located in Bingham Hall.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 K01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1): Employers did not identify TSI and sprayed or troweled on surfacing materials in buildings as asbestos-containing: Establishment - The employer did not identify Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI) such as but not limited to the boiler pipe and boiler surface materials located in Bingham Hall as asbestos-containing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1001 K01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,315 · Current $4,158 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(k)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) waste and debris and accompanying dust: Establishment - The employer did not ensure all surfaces in areas such as but not limited to the Bingham Hall boiler room walkway, cabinets, and boiler area were as free as practicable of Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) debris and accompanying dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4157.5
- — Z (S) $8315
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,315 · Current $4,158 Reduced
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): Establishment - The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program that included hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to asbestos.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4157.5
- — Z (S) $8315
1910.1001 J01 III
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(1)(iii): Employer did not include asbestos in the hazard communication program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) (� 29 CFR 1910.1200). Employers shall ensure that each employee is trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (j)(7) of this section: Establishment - The employer did not ensure that asbestos was included in a written hazard communication program or that each employee was given training regarding the hazards of asbestos and where asbestos containing materials were located throughout the facility including but not limited to Bingham Hall.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1001 J07 IV
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(7)(iv): The employer did not provide, at no cost to employees who perform housekeeping/maintenance operations in an area which contains presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) and/or other asbestos-containing material (ACM), an asbestos awareness training course: Establishment - The employer did not provide an asbestos awareness training course to employees performing housekeeping and maintenance in PACM and ACM areas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1101 K01 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9020
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1)(ii): The employer did not include asbestos in the program established to comply with the Hazard Communication Standard (HCS), did not ensure that each employee was trained in accordance with the provisions of HCS and paragraphs (k)(9) and (10) of this section, and did not provide each employee information on at least the following hazards: Cancer and lung effects: Establishment - The employer did not ensure that maintenance employees working in areas that had asbestos, such as but not limited to Bingham Hall, were trained regarding the hazards of asbestos, where the asbestos was located, and what level of work would be conducted in such areas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 611110)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343195962.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.