CHAGRIN FALLS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: VALLEY PAINTING COMPANY
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of VALLEY PAINTING COMPANY in 7584 COUNTRY LANE, CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44023 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 343199758.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Valley Painting Company — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Valley Painting Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VALLEY PAINTING COMPANY
- Site address
- 7584 COUNTRY LANE
- City
- CHAGRIN FALLS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44023
- Mailing
- 7584 COUNTRY LANE, CHAGRIN FALLS, OH 44023
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
19 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,664 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59): On or about June 4, 2018, where employees were engaged in the removal of lead based paint from a residential structure and in application of new paint and primer, the employer had not developed, implemented, and maintained a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1664
- — C (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) (Construction Reference: 1926.59): On or about June 4, 2018, where employees were engaged in the removal of lead based paint from a residential structure and in application of new paint and primer, the employer did not have safety data sheets for chemicals utilized readily available.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) On or about June 4, 2018, where employees were engaged in the removal of lead based paint from a residential structure and in application of new paint and primer, the employer did not provide effective information and training at the time of initial assignment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V F
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i) regarding 29 CFR 1926.59, Hazard Communication: On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed to provide lead hazard training in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i) to employees who should have been assumed overexposed to dust containing lead until otherwise determined through personal air monitoring when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that at least the following Lead hazards were communicated to employee(s): reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed to communicate the specified health hazards associated with lead exposure including reproductive/developmental toxicity, central nervous system effects, kidney effects, blood effects, and acute toxicity effects to employees who were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,664 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 µg/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA): On or about June 4, 2018, employees were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using manual scraping and sanding. The employer failed to determine if employees were exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 µg/m3. No air monitoring or exposure assessments were conducted.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1664
- — C (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.62 D01 III
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level: On or about June 4, 2018, employees were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using manual scraping and sanding. The employer failed to determine if employees were exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 µg/m3. No personal samples representative of a full shift were collected during paint removal activities.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V A
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,664 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f): On or about June 4, 2018 the employer failed to provide appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f) to employees who should have been assumed overexposed to dust containing lead until otherwise determined through personal air monitoring when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1664
- — C (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.62 F02 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(f)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1926.62 to use a respirator: On or about June 4, 2018, where employees were required to wear a dust mask when performing lead based paint removal from a residential home, the employer had not developed and implemented a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V B
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(g): On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed to provide and ensure the use of appropriate personal protective clothing such as, but not limited to, hats, shoes, shoe covers, goggles, face shields, and coveralls, in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(g) to employees who should have been assumed overexposed to dust containing lead until otherwise determined through personal air monitoring when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding applications.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.62 G01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1)(i): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that the employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments, such as, but not limited to coveralls or similar full-body work clothing: On or about June 4, 2018, the employer did not provide and ensure the use of protective work clothing such as, but not limited to, coveralls or similar full-body work clothing to employees who were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 G01 II
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1)(ii): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure the employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments, such as, but not limited to gloves, hat, and shoes or disposable shoe coverlets: On or about June 4, 2018, the employer did not provide and ensure the use of protective work clothing such as, but not limited to, hats and shoes or disposable shoe coverlets to employees who were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 G01 III
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1)(iii): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that the employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments, such as, but not limited to face shields, vented goggles, or other appropriate protective equipment which complies with 29 CFR 1910.133: On or about June 4, 2018, the employer did not provide and ensure the use of face shields or vented goggles to employees who were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V C
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2): On or about September 1, 2017, the employer failed to provide change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2) to employees who should have been assumed overexposed to dust containing lead until otherwise determined through personal air monitoring when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and heat gun applications.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.62 I02 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2)(i): The employer did not provide clean change areas as an interim protection for employees performing tasks as specified in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2), without regard to the use of respirators: On or about June 4, 2018, until an employee exposure assessment was performed, the employer failed to provide change areas to employees who were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V D
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(D): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with hand washing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5): On or about June 4, 2018 the employer failed to provide hand washing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5) to employees who should have been assumed overexposed to dust containing lead until otherwise determined through personal air monitoring when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.62 I05 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5)(i): The employer did not provide adequate handwashing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.51(f), for use by employees exposed to lead: On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed to provide adequate handwashing facilities to employees who were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V E
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(E): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with biological monitoring in accordance with 1926.62(j)(1)(i), to consist of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels: On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed to provide biological monitoring in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(I) to employees who should have been assumed overexposed to dust containing lead until otherwise determined through personal air monitoring when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2772
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.62 J01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(j)(1)(i): The employer did not make available initial medical surveillance, consisting of biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels, to employees occupationally exposed on any day to lead at or above the action level: On or about June 4, 2018, the employer failed conduct initial medical surveillance by providing biological monitoring of blood sampling and analysis to employees who were exposed to lead when removing paint from older homes using methods including, but not limited to, manual scraping and sanding.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Valley Painting Company
View Valley Painting Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
Jul 16, 2026
Stella Painting INC. · SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Jul 15, 2026
Empire Painting and Decorating INC · GRIDLEY, CA
Jul 15, 2026
WA317992082 - ALL Season Painting LLC · UNIVERSITY PLACE, WA
Jul 14, 2026
Jose Emilio Sorto · ANNAPOLIS, MD
Jul 14, 2026
Blue Star Chesapeake Holdings, LLC · ANNAPOLIS, MD
More inspections in OH
Jul 17, 2026
Teknol, INC. · DAYTON, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Lippert · PAYNE, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Provia · SUGARCREEK, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Greenacres Foundation · CINCINNATI, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Whirlaway Corporation · WELLINGTON, OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343199758.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.